Poker vs. BJ
I'd much rather play BJ than poker too, mainly because I'm much better at it. Without checking, I believe this thread started because someone wrote that BJ is dead or dying. I think it's dying and will be dead at some time when the casinos use chips that can track the bet size with the count. However, I still think there are many playable games around in the US and I will continue playing BJ. I've only played poker in a casino twice, one win and one loss. I probably shouldn't have won when I did but I was playing with $100 from BJ that I didn't care about losing. (I know, purists, that's wasted EV and a cardinal sin.)
I think BJ is boring too even if you see every hand. I guess double exposure BJ is great for you since you get to see all the cards for a longer time period.
There's also senseless, mindless chatter in BJ too. People blame me for losing when I switch the number of hands I'm playing or double A-7 vs. dealer's 6.
Poker is better than BJ because you don't have to worry about getting kicked out. I still think f you are a good player, you should be able to do very well and the long run in poker can't be as long as the long run in BJ.
However, it's all a matter of opinion. Good luck to you.