I would certainly give it up if I flew out over the ocean and just circled. The ending will be bad. That's what a progression player does, circles continuously with the inevitable crash at the end.
Hey,I guess that analogy is not that bad now that I think about it.
The system referenced in relation to using the Kelly Criteria, was posted here by me many years ago under North Wind. When I mentioned a few years ago that I had posted a serious system that no one had picked up on, I was asked to re-post. Before I could respond someone else here, in the same thread, posted a warning about casino spies.
I concluded someone was using it and therefore didn't re-post.
The system was meant only to demonstrate how it might be possible to overcome the house advantage.
Keep it up, I'm enjoying the attempt at comedy.
He has a nasty stammer.
Go to a $5 table with a bankroll of $1,250.
Assuming the house edge is 0.4%, bet minus $5 on each hand.
Open your eyes???
Let me wrap my head around this concept...
I sit down at a table, and convince the _dealer_ to bet $5 each hand by putting one of _his_ $5 chips in my betting circle. We then play the hand as though that wager was mine?
That's a concept I can understand and appreciate.
Off to tunica to try it out...
:)
OK, I talked a dealer into betting $5 for me each hand. But I damned well could not convince him to use any sort of progression and increase his bets.
Ah well, Guess I will have to take my penny per hand and be happy. :)
