Would you use progressive betting as a card counter? Such as the "Telephone System" of betting 2-1-2-3-4-5. Or do we stick with betting strategies based on the count?
Why would you care to implement a useless betting strategy? Is it for the purpose of cover?
I use Fred Renzeys KISS III count-it gets the $$$ end of story!Blackjack Bluebook II -my blackjack bible! Good cards!
.jpg)
and get cover from it, use whatever works. If you are using it in hopes of it magically making you money, try something more interesting. Maybe roll a single die at your betting spot; odd = stand, even = dd or split but if it's the 2nd odd in a row = take insurance, second even in a row = just hit, 3 odds or 3 evens in a row = double your next wager.
Good luck.
Back when conditions were good enough that playing strategy got you a small edge and any bet variation was extra candy.
Nowadays you have to use a much more optimized approach and bet much more strictly with the count or you are just wasting your time (at best).
Those really were good times.
I did that trick a few times, though quite differently from how Jae Lee describes it. It is a great concept with a million dollar bank-I had somewhat less than that (mid-nineties). You have to come up with a way of getting out of it to avoid a big bet into a count that tanks.
for the correlation point. I've seen it done at a poker table to randomize calling or folding on "coin flip" hands.
