McCain, a life-long Gambler?

I need some help in deciding who to vote, Obama or McCain-the"Pro"- Gambler?

From Wikipedia:
"As first a House member and then a senator � and as a life-long gambler with close ties to the gambling industry � McCain was one of the main authors of the 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which codified rules regarding Native American gambling enterprises."

In addition to the above info, of course, I need to consider many more factors (such as your points of views) before I cast my vote. As a gambler, who will you vote, and why? Before you answer, you may want to read their profiles.

McCain:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_mccain

Obama:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama

That's easy. Vote for the guy who is paying off the voting machines programmer.

Obama is a light Poker Player at his own home game.
McCain is a "whale" at Craps tables all over the country, preferring very very long sessions at reserved tables, with one or more friend alongside.

If it's true that McCain chooses craps at a disadvantage versus blackjack with perfect BS, that would actually be a check mark against him. Why would I vote for a ploppy who should, and easily could, know better?

The real issue is one of smarts and who has them.
I am not smart enough to be a GOOD choice as the Prez.
You aren't either.

Obama went to Columbia University and later graduated Summa Cum Laude at Harvard Law School. He Graduated No. 1 at the best Law School in the world ! That impresses me.

McCain did not go to Grad School.

He went to an (academically) 3rd rate school - The U.S.Naval Academy where he just barely graduated.

Out of a class of about 888 he graduated something like 885th !

Experience is sometimes how one describes many years of doing the wrong things without learning to improve what you are doing.

Just ask any donkey ploppy playing BJ that standing on a 12 vs. a dealer's deuce is not a good idea. he is very likely to tell you that he has been playing 21 since the Kennedy administration.

Yeah, he has tons of experience alright. [L.O.L.]

Then look at a bunch of M.I.T. kids still wet-behind-the-years. Their experience at gambling ? Zero ! But tell them what needs to be done via utilizing their intellect and they certainly succeeded, didn't they ?

John McCain has a history of accomplishing almost nothing. He at leasts knows that the public has had more than enough of Bush/Cheney - so he tries to distance himself from Bush. For the first time in history a seated President is NOT campaigning for his party's candidate. Doh'! McCain tries to convince us that he is a "MAVERICK" What a hoot. He admits to supporting Bush over 90% of the time, and when it came to important bills and policies it is close to 100%.

In any case, his slecting an absurdly unqualified moronic running mate like Sarah Palin simply cooked his (political) goose.

The pollsters claims to a (now) 10-11% lead in the popular vote probably overstate the case; but I will gladly wager you a GREAT DEAL of money that McCain loses by at least 2%, which in political science / history terms is a bad beating.

But lets remember something important here. The popular vote does NOT elect the Prez. The Electoral College does. In that arena, it is even more certain that Obama wins than it is in the popular vote.

Under Clinton we had a Budget Surplus, Peace, and Prosperity.

Under Bush we have a frightening National Deficit, war, and are near economic collapse.

The choice is easy to make. A real no-brainer.

If he's so smart, how come he's a socialist?
Remove incentive, lower productivity.

You said: "Remove incentive, lower productivity. "

Nobody making a million a year stops finding incentive to get richer just because their taxes go up a little.

That is beyond absurd.

Obama's progressive notions work to improve the status of middle class Americans - and that certainly INCREASES productivity.

Middle Class Americans are stressed out - removing those stressors will make them happy and productive, not miserable and unmotivated.

Use your head.

He was born in the Panama Canal Zone. At the time this was controlled by the United States. With few exceptions, you could not live there unless you were in the military or worked for a government controlled entity. No-one could own land; you were assigned a house based on your job status.

Before you make any comments about the coming election or the bank bailout, you need to have a look at the link below. This writer focuses on the real issues not those merely imagined. The bane of society is corprotacracy at both the state and federal levels.

when you came up with the name of that case in AC.