K.O. Double deck

Just read the book and contrary to what the authors have said about the system’s effectiveness on double deck, I have noticed what other people besides the authors have said being contrary to the authors statements in regards to K.O. Effectiveness in double deck. After playing hours on hours switching between Hi-lo and KO, I’ve noticed the difference in accuracy between the two. The authors did state that KO was more of a correlation of betting spreads and ramps more than an accurate description of deck composition. However, I’ve noticed that with a Six deck game the KO is significantly more accurate in deck composition than with double deck. I’m just curious as to why this discrepancy occurs between the two different deck sizes.

Absolutely nothing you do with your personal play can possibly confirm the kind of assertions you're making. Anecdotal play results are utterly useless when discussing these sorts of things. After you've played about 100 billion hands, then you can draw conclusions! 😊

Don

I'm not really drawing my only conclusion , it's based what I've heard other notable APs have said on the matter. So I guess its a confirmation bias, most definitely. I'm just curious as to how they have drawn these conclusions. Suppose I get a rational answer then I might alter my game to suit double deck play. Otherwise I will stick with K.O. until someone can elaborate further on why one should choose hi lo for double deck and prefer K.O. for a shoe game. Ive only heard these comments in brief on the gamblers edge a time or two without an explanation.

"Otherwise I will stick with K.O. until someone can elaborate further on why one should choose hi lo for double deck and prefer K.O. for a shoe game."

Comments like these are not based on SCOREs; they're based on alleged ease of use to the player.

Don

What exactly is the argument here? When I played double decks, I used Hi-OPT.   Neither KO nor HiLo.  

Johnny and the others don't digest the importance of your comments.

I stated that decades ago there was no resource for questions/feedback from wannabes  present on the free pages here.

Although Revere's lessons were ok, he lacked the patience to answer some questions that you provide, to their deaf ears.

I say thank you for them!