.
Player 1 used the HiLo indexes; Player 2 simply played BS. Here are the Summary results, along with Hand Types Won/Lost for each player:
SummaryHere a summary by seat or player is displayed. Hands skipped indicates hands not played due to "Wonging." Action is Total $ bet per hour and Win Rate is $ won per hour. IBA is advantage related to the Initial Bet (before double downs.) Std. Devs. are always by player and DI is Desirability Index as defined by BJ Attack. | Hands | $/Hour | Units
W/L | Advan. | Std Dev | Performance | Seat | Played | Skip | % | Action | WinRate | Units
W/L | TBA% | IBA% | SE | Round | Hour | 100 | Shoe | DI | SCORE | N0 | Factor | 1 | 411,658,692 | | | $21,050 | $163.21 | 6,528,204 | 0.775 | 0.904 | .019 | 3.87 | 38.70 | 38.70 | 20.7 | 4.22 | 17.79 | 56,223 | .712 | 2 | 411,144,976 | | | $20,283 | $109.90 | 4,395,932 | 0.542 | 0.609 | .018 | 3.66 | 36.56 | 36.56 | 19.5 | 3.01 | 9.04 | 110,675 | .362 | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
StrategiesSeat | Playing Strategy | Betting Strategy | 1 | Complete High-Low | 1-15 Spread | 2 | BS with HiLo Tags | 1-15 Spread | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | |
TotalsRounds: 400,000,000 | Hands: 822,803,668 | Shoes: 14,022,586 | Hours: 4,000,000 |
Results by type of hand are provided. The first four columns of data display the number of bets made, won, lost and tied. Units bet and won are provided. Advantage is Total Bet Advantage.Player #1: Hand Types | | Hands | Units | Advantage | | Total | Won | Lost | Tied | Bet | Won/Lost | Percent | Std. Dev. | Ins. | 2,551,714 | 882,705 | -1,669,009 | | 12,573,440 | 630,802 | 5.017% | 0.05 | Splits | 21,872,808 | 10,498,987 | -9,797,225 | 1,576,596 | 55,107,600 | 5,949,192 | 10.796% | 0.03 | Soft DD | 7,658,109 | 3,962,022 | -3,235,926 | 460,161 | 31,703,380 | 3,959,330 | 12.489% | 0.05 | Hard DD | 35,700,260 | 19,881,792 | -13,230,519 | 2,587,949 | 129,166,300 | 25,589,180 | 19.811% | 0.022 | All DD | 43,358,369 | 23,843,814 | -16,466,445 | 3,048,110 | 160,869,600 | 29,548,510 | 18.368% | 0.020 |
Results by type of hand are provided. The first four columns of data display the number of bets made, won, lost and tied. Units bet and won are provided. Advantage is Total Bet Advantage.Player #2: Hand Types | | Hands | Units | Advantage | | Total | Won | Lost | Tied | Bet | Won/Lost | Percent | Std. Dev. | Splits | 21,059,418 | 10,010,692 | -9,523,480 | 1,525,246 | 41,887,840 | 2,975,843 | 7.104% | 0.03 | Soft DD | 7,025,474 | 3,616,723 | -2,996,576 | 412,175 | 24,087,320 | 2,572,612 | 10.680% | 0.05 | Hard DD | 35,587,268 | 19,815,862 | -13,208,126 | 2,563,280 | 116,066,700 | 24,519,560 | 21.125% | 0.022 | All DD | 42,612,742 | 23,432,585 | -16,204,702 | 2,975,455 | 140,154,000 | 27,092,170 | 19.330% | 0.020 |
As you can see, Player 1 had a much higher Win Rate: $163.21/hr vs. $109.90/hr. Player 1 also had a higher Initial Bet Advantage: 0.904% vs. 0.609%.
If you compare the "Hand Types Won/Lost" Units Won/Lost results for the two players, you'll see that Player 1 won significantly more units than did Player 2 in all of these high-edge categories.
As for the question of which indexes are most important, you really need to get Don Schlesinger's Blackjack Attack 3, which covers this territory in excellent detail.
If you'd like to post the particulars of your situation (games, rules, pen, bet schedule), perhaps I or one of my colleagues will be able to answer your question more fully.
Hope this helps!
Dog Hand
Clarification
Thanks Dog
I am trying to figure out what the advantage of using each index on average. I want to assume that you don't move your bet at all based on the count and all that you do is adjust your play for the I18 based on HiLo. I am trying to figure out what the advantage would be on average for each situation for the I18, for example 10 vs 10 or 16 vs 10. I would think that the player has more of an advantage for example to stay on 16 vs 10 the higher the count is, but I'm trying to find more of an average advantage for each situation of the I18 to change from BS to the index play. I don't know if it would be an easy calculation to figure out advantage for each of the I18 indexes but if it isn't I am trying to figure out the advantage in total of using the I18 indexes vs BS without moving bet. The game rules are H17, DAS, DA2 for SD, DD and 6-deck with 75% pen. I hope this is more clear. Thanks.
Answer
The approximate answers to your question can be found in BJA3, p. 62, Table 5.1, column 9.
Recently, one of our foremost theoreticians, "Zenfighter," has revisited the entire process of generating the I18 advantages, for several different count systems. I can't give you a date, but he and I will collaborate to bring this incredible study to the public in the near future.
Don
It was suggested :-)
But, I tried to ignore him! :-)
Don
Here are some numbers...
SuperD,
Here are three sims for three players playing a SD, H17, DA2, DAS game with 6 rounds heads up (so, Rule of 7). All three are flat-betting $100/round. Player 1 uses Complete HiLo: all the indexes. Player 2 uses just the Illustrious 18 indexes. Player 3 plays BS only.
****************************** PLAYER 1 ******************************
HiLo Edge from Indexes SD Player 1 Saturday, June 12, 2010, 06:26 PM SummaryHere a summary by seat or player is displayed. Hands skipped indicates hands not played due to "Wonging." Action is Total $ bet per hour and Win Rate is $ won per hour. IBA is advantage related to the Initial Bet (before double downs.) Std. Devs. are always by player and DI is Desirability Index as defined by BJ Attack. | Hands | $/Hour | Units
W/L | Advan. | Std Dev | Performance | Seat | Played | Skip | % | Action | WinRate | Units
W/L | TBA% | IBA% | SE | Round | Hour | 100 | Shoe | DI | SCORE | N0 | Factor | 1 | 410,012,840 | | | $11,522 | $32.74 | 1,309,414 | 0.284 | 0.327 | .006 | 1.17 | 11.66 | 11.66 | 2.9 | 2.81 | 7.88 | 126,963 | .315 | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
StrategiesSeat | Playing Strategy | Betting Strategy | 1 | Complete High-Low | Flat Bet | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | |
TotalsRounds: 400,000,000 | Hands: 410,012,840 | Shoes: 66,666,667 | Hours: 4,000,000 |
Results by type of hand are provided. The first four columns of data display the number of bets made, won, lost and tied. Units bet and won are provided. Advantage is Total Bet Advantage.Player #1: Hand Types | | Hands | Units | Advantage | | Total | Won | Lost | Tied | Bet | Won/Lost | Percent | Std. Dev. | Ins. | 9,210,405 | 3,281,803 | -5,928,602 | | 4,605,203 | 317,502 | 6.894% | 0.025 | Splits | 18,981,438 | 9,522,421 | -8,111,613 | 1,347,404 | 22,086,450 | 2,102,481 | 9.519% | 0.03 | Soft DD | 9,051,331 | 4,812,274 | -3,727,487 | 511,570 | 18,102,660 | 2,169,574 | 11.985% | 0.04 | Hard DD | 37,191,896 | 20,957,220 | -13,448,933 | 2,785,743 | 74,383,790 | 15,016,530 | 20.188% | 0.021 | All DD | 46,243,227 | 25,769,494 | -17,176,420 | 3,297,313 | 92,486,450 | 17,186,100 | 18.582% | 0.019 |
****************************** PLAYER 2 ******************************
HiLo Edge from Indexes SD Player 2 Saturday, June 12, 2010, 06:27 PM | SummaryHere a summary by seat or player is displayed. Hands skipped indicates hands not played due to "Wonging." Action is Total $ bet per hour and Win Rate is $ won per hour. IBA is advantage related to the Initial Bet (before double downs.) Std. Devs. are always by player and DI is Desirability Index as defined by BJ Attack. | Hands | $/Hour | Units
W/L | Advan. | Std Dev | Performance | Seat | Played | Skip | % | Action | WinRate | Units
W/L | TBA% | IBA% | SE | Round | Hour | 100 | Shoe | DI | SCORE | N0 | Factor | 1 | 409,475,480 | | | $11,527 | $21.32 | 852,644 | 0.185 | 0.213 | .006 | 1.17 | 11.67 | 11.67 | 2.9 | 1.83 | 3.34 | 299,607 | .134 | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
StrategiesSeat | Playing Strategy | Betting Strategy | 1 | Complete High-Low | Flat Bet | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | |
TotalsRounds: 400,000,000 | Hands: 409,475,480 | Shoes: 66,666,667 | Hours: 4,000,000 |
Results by type of hand are provided. The first four columns of data display the number of bets made, won, lost and tied. Units bet and won are provided. Advantage is Total Bet Advantage.Player #1: Hand Types | | Hands | Units | Advantage | | Total | Won | Lost | Tied | Bet | Won/Lost | Percent | Std. Dev. | Ins. | 9,217,399 | 3,284,947 | -5,932,452 | | 4,608,703 | 318,721 | 6.916% | 0.025 | Splits | 18,118,336 | 8,953,588 | -7,869,138 | 1,295,610 | 21,113,410 | 1,744,946 | 8.265% | 0.03 | Soft DD | 8,638,190 | 4,530,176 | -3,625,297 | 482,717 | 17,276,370 | 1,809,758 | 10.475% | 0.04 | Hard DD | 38,337,628 | 21,452,270 | -14,014,964 | 2,870,394 | 76,675,250 | 14,874,590 | 19.399% | 0.021 | All DD | 46,975,818 | 25,982,446 | -17,640,261 | 3,353,111 | 93,951,620 | 16,684,340 | 17.758% | 0.019 |
****************************** PLAYER 3 ******************************
HiLo Edge from Indexes SD Player 3 Saturday, June 12, 2010, 06:27 PM | SummaryHere a summary by seat or player is displayed. Hands skipped indicates hands not played due to "Wonging." Action is Total $ bet per hour and Win Rate is $ won per hour. IBA is advantage related to the Initial Bet (before double downs.) Std. Devs. are always by player and DI is Desirability Index as defined by BJ Attack. | Hands | $/Hour | Units
W/L | Advan. | Std Dev | Performance | Seat | Played | Skip | % | Action | WinRate | Units
W/L | TBA% | IBA% | SE | Round | Hour | 100 | Shoe | DI | SCORE | N0 | Factor | 1 | 408,629,492 | | | $11,363 | ($4.69) | -187,750 | -0.041 | -0.047 | .006 | 1.16 | 11.61 | 11.61 | 2.8 | -.40 | -.16 | - | -.006 | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
StrategiesSeat | Playing Strategy | Betting Strategy | 1 | BS with HiLo Tags | Flat Bet | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | |
TotalsRounds: 400,000,000 | Hands: 408,629,492 | Shoes: 66,666,667 | Hours: 4,000,000 |
Results by type of hand are provided. The first four columns of data display the number of bets made, won, lost and tied. Units bet and won are provided. Advantage is Total Bet Advantage.Player #1: Hand Types | | Hands | Units | Advantage | | Total | Won | Lost | Tied | Bet | Won/Lost | Percent | Std. Dev. | Splits | 16,742,671 | 8,059,947 | -7,469,924 | 1,212,800 | 19,694,350 | 1,253,903 | 6.367% | 0.04 | Soft DD | 8,645,552 | 4,534,965 | -3,627,510 | 483,077 | 17,291,090 | 1,814,910 | 10.496% | 0.04 | Hard DD | 37,249,728 | 20,938,480 | -13,628,651 | 2,682,597 | 74,499,490 | 14,619,630 | 19.624% | 0.021 | All DD | 45,895,280 | 25,473,445 | -17,256,161 | 3,165,674 | 91,790,580 | 16,434,540 | 17.904% | 0.019 |
**********************************************************************
If you compare their Initial Bet Advantages (or EV's), you'll see that Player 1's IBA is the highest, at 0.327%; Player 2's IBA is in the middle, at 0.213%; and Player 3's IBA is the worst, at -0.047%. Thus, you can see for this game that using just the I18 produces a gain in EV of +0.260% over BS, while using ALL the indexes produces a gain of +0.374% over BS.
The single largest gain over BS is for Insurance. Note that Players 1 and 2 each won about 318,000 units due to insurance bets, while of course Player 3 never took insurance.
Hope this helps!
Dog Hand
Original Source
If you look in the invaluable "The Theory of Blackjack" by Peter Griffin (6th ed.) you will find two tables giving the exact value of violating your Basic Strategy plays in accordance with the True Count. The first table is for Single Deck. The second is for Infinite Deck. You can easily interpolate between the two if you are sufficiently obsessive.
In a shoe game there are < 20 valuable ones with Insurance and Sixteen vs. Face being the most important.
pp. 30, 229, 230 "Average Gains for Varying Basic Strategy"
Average Gains for Varying Basic Strategy (thousandth of a percent)
I thought so
Obviously, I'm more than just casually aware of those charts. But, they are for perfect play, not for any count system. And, of course, they tell you nothing about how volatile the play is.
Don
| |