Feedback I have had from other people who use my computer!
The following are purchaser's accounts of the device upon first use in the majority of cases so you know what to expect from the system in general. In nearly all cases the system reported to have hit 1 in 18 on average!
Hello Mark
>Nice to hear from you again.
>First a couple of comments on your updates.
>A partial timing of the rotor would save a couple of seconds but I think the
>error
>would be too costly.As for deacceleration of the rotor, I used to incorporate
>this but
>cut it out of my setting up and assume a decent Huxley wheel shows a 1%
>falloff.
>ie Wheel revs=revs*.99.
>Ive noticed some disscussion on the net re. Lawrence Scott and his videos.
>I use this video for testing my software, and his method depends on the table
>being tilted .If we knew where the ball was going to fall off it would be too
>easy.
>My own developments are showing an advantage of 15-20% and if it continues for
>another 2 months I will get in touch and perhaps come up to Sheffield for an
>exchange of ideas.
>
>Keep well
>Best regards
>
>Barry
Hi Mark
Thank you for your letter. Due to my work i was unable to go the casino as
often as i want to test the system but this is going to be a change. As a
matter of fact i have decided to bring the Psion to test the system
tonight. There is no doubt in my mind the system is working with the tilted
wheel. The roulette wheels is branch new here so i have to set the equation
to LEVEL, I will report to you if i have any sucess with it later on.
Michael from Gothenberg had contacted me, we had a nice chat over the phone.
He and I have decided to go to London to play the system in one casino which
i frequented. I was using visual tracking then.
Best regards
Bruce
Hello Mark,
How is the work going on the program update using the Matrix? I had a good session at the casino yesterday with the Psion. Made several hundred dollars using only small betting units. The time spent taking data readings to build the 'scatter hump' is well worth it! It is amazing how the program builds a 'picture' of the wheel's signature scatter!
Well, that's all for now. Please let me know when the Matrix program version is done. Also, please feel free to send any other information. As you know by now, I always enjoy reading and studying any material/information you send.
Dan
Eudaemon
Mark,
Thanks for the e-mail. It will be great to get a copy of Basieux's book. I think it is a wise decision to release it to our group. It should generate ideas and feedback from group members beneficial to all of us!
Has work been completed on the program improvements (scatter hump identification and new wheel timing method)? I am eager to incorporate them in my Psion.
I am happy to report that I have finally made my first casino play with the Psion. It was successful (of course!). My winnings were relatively small, but I am thrilled with this success!!!
I am pursuing a new idea of implementing the system using an alternative to the Psion. I will report back in a few weeks on whether it has been successful.
Best always,
Dan
PS I have been reading your postings to Gamblers Glen . It is good to see that the tone of recent postings has turned positive. People FINALLY seem to be actually thinking about what you have to say.
Hi There Marky:-)))))))))))))))))))))))))
You are a genius, thought you had sold me a trick, even after you demostrating this to me live, thought the trip from LA was a waste of time,even thought you was some clever magician.
I could not get this program to work in the casino, 4 nights went by, then I realised that I had set the instructions up wrong. Was tempted to pay you a visit, thinking I was conned and all.
Read the instructions again, fifth night, bingo BOY!! It bloody works******
I set it up on a nice tilted wheel, I did not leave that table until I wanted the john, but 5 hours plus later, betting heavy, but winning exactly as stated 1 in 17( I think, to busy looking at the booty), I left the tables with $14,000 dollars. If I had not had a shot of Whisky first, I would not have coped with the pit boss starring at meLOLOLOLOLOL
How you gonna improve this system, it does not need improving, works BRILLIANTLY****
YOU ARE A HONEST CLEVER SCIENTIST, like something out of a film, man*****
My wife has offered to put you up the next time you come to out part of the world, maybe we can get out together, bring your wife!
By the way enjoyed talking to you very much, will keep you posted of my progress.
Edward ---------------------------
Hi Iouri
See below for reply in your email>
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:10:30 +0400 (MSD)
>
>
>HI Mark!!!
>Today I have visited two casinos, in the first I have won $50, in the second $150,
>I played from 18-00 o'clock in the evening up to 6 o'clock in the morning, I very much am glad that have not lost:)))
>I was necessary to tell about problems with which has collided....
>1. The program has given failure, has written about a mistake (what I do not remember), I have reloaded a computer,
>And all became good, was not disconnected any more.. Write what code it is necessary to enter, about it it is written to instructions..
>I have noticed that the computer speaks very much frequently "17-18" why it is always identical?
Because if you count the numbers from Zero Clockwise ,number 17 is 8 numbers from Zero.
If you count 8 numbers from Zero, anti clockwise, you get the number 18.
So another would be 32-26, each 1 number clockwise, and 1 number anticlockwise.
You should only be betting on one of these numbers, if the ball is going clockwise, bet on 17, if it is going anti clcokwise, bet on 18!
The reason you have remembered this pair of numbers is that it is in normal order> 16,'17','18',19,20 etc
>2. I have attached a computer to a leg as pockets big at me are not present, at us hot and it is necessary to go
>In easy clothes to not cause suspicion. Tables with a roulette of people have not enough, and consequently I could not
>To collect 70 data (to not cause suspicion), I have collected 10-15 data and started to place chips,
>If I guessed number that the data did not collect while instructions of a computer became absolutely remote
>From the validity. If they became absolutely others that again entered the formula 2-3 times..
>As I understand collecting the data the main problem..
>I want to remove the latent videocamera (I now do her) a wheel of a roulette, and then on the monitor
>To bring all data how you think, correctly? And I have thought up the device which will remove the data with
>The monitor automatically..
>3. When you start to win that croupier very much frequently changes a sphere, and the data become unfit for use..
>The croupier very quickly starts a sphere but very slowly a rotor of a wheel, therefore the rate have not time to make,
>What to do? To wait good Spins? I played on the big sectors but if I played on neighbours, I could win
>It is a lot of, but if in one number I could win that of anything. Your way of game is necessary for me....!!!
>4. On a computer from above there is designation ACC-...., what it means?,
>And from below " Hit rate " that it means? At me ACC =-6.4567 when I trained at home, and in a casino
This means you had 6.45 seconds to place a bet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>After I have left ACC = 1291.69356.....
Not sure about this, the ACC is ignored unless practicing at home, it is for home use only!
ACC is accuracy.
If you click the last click when the ball hits the rotor in play mode, instead of clicking this last click after the last rotor timing, the computer shows the difference of the predicted time of distance from the computers calcualtions, and the real time of distance from the actual timing, it still gives a result, but after the last click, so you can not use this in real play mode. It is there if you want to check how good you have set up equations, and how good you are at taking timings in play mode. If you have a roulette wheel at home, or video footage, then you can open the computer, and watch the difference in real time and predicted time in PLAY mode.
>5. Also I want to ask you to write what to do if the data you start to enter with a mistake as them to cancel,
>I know that I already asked, but I have not understood a little, I ask an apology.....
>How to cancel at all stages of pressing of the button.
>You cannot, if you have started to take timings, then you must finish that sequence by clicking in the rest of the clicks. Then what ever you are doing ,you must do this again to correct, especially in SET EQUATIONS
Practice making deliberate mistakes, if you do, go through the sequence!
THe computer says 'SET EQUATIONS', after you have just set them, in case you have done it wrong, if you click here by accident, the computer then says 'CONFIRM', you need to click again to confirm setting equations again. So yuo have to do two clicks to get in SET EQUATIONS, so it should be difficult to make a mistake!
>I am sorry for the English language, it is very difficult for me...
>In general I can congratulate you, the program really works!!!
>But to win money is very much not easy work, you become similar on zombi :))
SO you know that it is boring to play in the casino, because you have to play methodically, I know this ZOMBI FEELING WELL;-))))))))))
>At me still it is a lot of questions, but I while have forgotten them, I intoxicate by a victory!!!
SPeak to you soon Iouri, you can keep asking as many questions as you wish!
Speak to you soon,
regards MARK.
Hi Iouri
See below for reply in your email>
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:10:30 +0400 (MSD)
>
>
>HI Mark!!!
>Today I have visited two casinos, in the first I have won $50, in the second $150,
>I played from 18-00 o'clock in the evening up to 6 o'clock in the morning, I very much am glad that have not lost:)))
>I was necessary to tell about problems with which has collided....
>1. The program has given failure, has written about a mistake (what I do not remember), I have reloaded a computer,
>And all became good, was not disconnected any more.. Write what code it is necessary to enter, about it it is written to instructions..
>I have noticed that the computer speaks very much frequently "17-18" why it is always identical?
Because if you count the numbers from Zero Clockwise ,number 17 is 8 numbers from Zero.
If you count 8 numbers from Zero, anti clockwise, you get the number 18.
So another would be 32-26, each 1 number clockwise, and 1 number anticlockwise.
You should only be betting on one of these numbers, if the ball is going clockwise, bet on 17, if it is going anti clcokwise, bet on 18!
The reason you have remembered this pair of numbers is that it is in normal order> 16,'17','18',19,20 etc
>2. I have attached a computer to a leg as pockets big at me are not present, at us hot and it is necessary to go
>In easy clothes to not cause suspicion. Tables with a roulette of people have not enough, and consequently I could not
>To collect 70 data (to not cause suspicion), I have collected 10-15 data and started to place chips,
>If I guessed number that the data did not collect while instructions of a computer became absolutely remote
>From the validity. If they became absolutely others that again entered the formula 2-3 times..
>As I understand collecting the data the main problem..
>I want to remove the latent videocamera (I now do her) a wheel of a roulette, and then on the monitor
>To bring all data how you think, correctly? And I have thought up the device which will remove the data with
>The monitor automatically..
>3. When you start to win that croupier very much frequently changes a sphere, and the data become unfit for use..
>The croupier very quickly starts a sphere but very slowly a rotor of a wheel, therefore the rate have not time to make,
>What to do? To wait good Spins? I played on the big sectors but if I played on neighbours, I could win
>It is a lot of, but if in one number I could win that of anything. Your way of game is necessary for me....!!!
>4. On a computer from above there is designation ACC-...., what it means?,
>And from below " Hit rate " that it means? At me ACC =-6.4567 when I trained at home, and in a casino
This means you had 6.45 seconds to place a bet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>After I have left ACC = 1291.69356.....
Not sure about this, the ACC is ignored unless practicing at home, it is for home use only!
ACC is accuracy.
If you click the last click when the ball hits the rotor in play mode, instead of clicking this last click after the last rotor timing, the computer shows the difference of the predicted time of distance from the computers calcualtions, and the real time of distance from the actual timing, it still gives a result, but after the last click, so you can not use this in real play mode. It is there if you want to check how good you have set up equations, and how good you are at taking timings in play mode. If you have a roulette wheel at home, or video footage, then you can open the computer, and watch the difference in real time and predicted time in PLAY mode.
>5. Also I want to ask you to write what to do if the data you start to enter with a mistake as them to cancel,
>I know that I already asked, but I have not understood a little, I ask an apology.....
>How to cancel at all stages of pressing of the button.
>You cannot, if you have started to take timings, then you must finish that sequence by clicking in the rest of the clicks. Then what ever you are doing ,you must do this again to correct, especially in SET EQUATIONS
Practice making deliberate mistakes, if you do, go through the sequence!
THe computer says 'SET EQUATIONS', after you have just set them, in case you have done it wrong, if you click here by accident, the computer then says 'CONFIRM', you need to click again to confirm setting equations again. So yuo have to do two clicks to get in SET EQUATIONS, so it should be difficult to make a mistake!
>I am sorry for the English language, it is very difficult for me...
>In general I can congratulate you, the program really works!!!
>But to win money is very much not easy work, you become similar on zombi :))
SO you know that it is boring to play in the casino, because you have to play methodically, I know this ZOMBI FEELING WELL;-))))))))))
>At me still it is a lot of questions, but I while have forgotten them, I intoxicate by a victory!!!
SPeak to you soon Iouri, you can keep asking as many questions as you wish!
Speak to you soon,
regards MARK.
"
Reply-To :
hochu
To :
markanthony18@hotmail.com
Subject :
Re:ROULETTE
Date :
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:27:36 +0400 (MSD)
Reply Reply All Forward Delete Printer Friendly Version
Hi Mark!!
Again I speak about you that you the genius, have developed the ingenious
formula!
I express you the respect!!!
Today at night I again have visited a casino, I have won $ 100 played on minimal
To the rates, when I shall collect necessary bank I shall play with the large
money..
This time computer spoke practically precisely number, dropped out
The next number.. It is a pity that the results of input of the formula cannot
be kept
On a disk of the computer.
I want to wish to you successes in work!!
>Hi Iouri
>
>See below for reply in your email>
>
>
>>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:10:30 +0400 (MSD)
>>
Hi Max
A happy Christmas and New year to you too!
See below for my replies!
I would also like to ask if you would be willing to publish on my message board with emails such as this, I will let you remain anonymous if you wish! Its just that some of the people out there who have purchased the system could do with some encouragement with emails such as this, it might also prove to be to your benefit, one of the guys is knocking out some CD's with some footage on it, may be helpful for future timing practice, something I have got to get round to doing at some stage! Another one of the guys has some excellent contact with SMD surface mount technology companies and has works in R&D at the University. He is talking of doing a joint venture and using lasers to measure the speed of the rotor and the ball and putting all the package into some very small hand held device.
I have thought of doing this already, but in my device ( The size of a cigarette lighter) you would have one button on one side to take timings, another pad on the other side that would be a braile pad, this can transmit the number to you by braile! so no transmitters would be needed! Also the device would have a built in vibration unit in it, to let you know when to change the timings! I can do this, but need a small micro controller that can support Floating point arithematic, otherwise it get complex, see the link below>
http://www.embedded.com/98
The group is at> but not anyone who is winning constantly has come forward to post?
See highlighted response below>
kind regards
Mark Anthony Howe esq.
>From: Max
>Reply-To: Max
>To: "mark anthony"
>Subject: You program is working :-)
>Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:06:50 +0200
>
>Hello Mark,
>
>Marry Christmas and Happy New Year. I am happy to let you know that I
>really have a progress with your program. I won back costs of the
>computer and even tripled that investment.
>
>Though I can get constant wins only playing against wheels where ball
>scatters not much from the hit point. I found that it is very
>important to find right wheel to play with, since the least the
>scatter - the higher payout. I found couple of such tables in Ukraine
>during my business trip. There are I made most of the money. These are
>produced by Huxley, but they are different because of the high blades
>dividing pockets with numbers on the wheel. Because of these blades
>the ball do not have enough power to jump over them, so the ball
>stayed in +/- 7 numbers from the predicted one, with 5 direct hits
>during an hour. What a pleasure to play with these wheels.
>
>Also I visited one of the eastern European country located nearby
>Ukraine, and found that their largest casino group (they have about 15
>casinos around the country) uses such type of the wheel. The scatter
>is higher but still predictions on these wheels are much better then
>for the usual type of the wheel. I played only 3 hours with low stakes
>but managed to win more then USD 1000 there. So, do you think it can
>be a good idea to find free to play there together? You can win a lot
>on this wheel, and I can get very valuable experience from your play.
>And, again, this is not Russia or Ukraine; this is European country
>with a good services and conditions.
>
I would love to Max, but a little difficult at the present time, my partner is expecting twins, due in feb, so things are a little hectic here for the moment, me doing the shopping and cleaning as well as my own work! But we will get together sometime, I am sure!>Unfortunately such wheels are very rare here, so usually we have to
>play against wheels with high scatters. But haven't you ever
>considered trying to calculate second peak that you sometime mentioned
>in our correspondence? Will it be possible to calculate expected
>disposition from the hit point for each spin? Will you be better off
>betting second number calculated as a second peak? Or it is just not
>possible to find this number? I would think that speed of the rotor;
>weight and size of the ball are the most important factors defining
>how far the ball might go from the predicted number, while speed of
>the ball falling to the rotor shall be more or less constant. Do you
>think it is possible to find equation for calculation of this
>disposition? You don't need too Max, its simple really, your graph of the high point was good, but if you now make one for the hit position and final position first, before you start even using the program, you will be able to see after about 150 spins ,where these second high points are! Then you can add this value, say + 12, this is usually the number on my Huxley wheel, you can bet at the hit point, and also at this second high point! This can be added into the program manually, or by just clicking the value in! You will soon see the signature of the wheel, this signature ususally represents all of the same types of wheels, the only discretion been where the diamonds are slightly in a different place at the high point! So in other words, it is better to get each individual signature of each new wheel you play on!
>
>Regarding your program: I have made following improvements of the
>interface:
>
>1) set equation by pressing button after hearing "ready" and holding
>it until first beep: So you can set equation when you want to. rather
>then listening question after each spin. I found that it is more
>convenient.
>2) I added basic check of the timing for equation: since ball is
>decelerating, T1 < T2 < T3 < T4 etc. So when following timing is less
>then preceding, it informs about error. Do you think this simple check
>can be useful?
>3) For stupid dealers who tend to change ball very often I decided to
>add function of switching the ball. Usually they change the ball when
>you start winning (and you start winning because you finally got the
>right equation, which you do not want to loose). When dealer changes
>the ball, you just need to press button after hearing "ready" and hold
>until second beep, and then input number from 1 to 4 (you can assign
>up to 4 balls). So, all the data for this ball will be loaded from
>files, also these data for the current ball number will be saved
>automatically after setting equation. When you start - current ball is
>number one, and you can change it during play.
> You are definately a better programmer than me Max!
>But here I need you help: if you look at the procedure of saving and
>loading data for the ball (saveB and loadB) you will see that I am
>saving all the globals, this is because I do not know exactly what
>variables are calculated in setEquat used in calculation for
>prediction. So, could you, please, advice me what variables I need to
>save for the ball, in order to optimize the code. Here I need your
>help, Mark, could you please clarify the list of variables that are
>defined in the sub setequat and are used for calculation of the
>prediction in sub use? Until then on order to avoid mistakes I am
>saving all the globals, which is obviously not required.
> You only need to save the following variables !
AX(7),BX(7),CX(7), AX(14),BX(14),CX(14)
>---------------------------------------------------------
>Also, could you please, explain me how to calculate deceleration of
>the rotor and use it in the formula? (or even better if you send me
>the code I need to add to the program). I would like to add this to
>the program to see if it may improve efficiency of predictions. I have
>already done one step implementing procedures saveW and loadW that
>save properties of the wheel in the file ROUL\wheel.odb, there I am
>going to save data regarding deceleration of the particular wheel.
>Then this file can be copied somewhere and used when you play against
>this wheel. Do you think it is a good idea?
> Yes, you can't get more accurate than saving the exact data, but I will be redoing the equation that sets up the deceleration on each new wheel of play, Cannot find the bloody code for this, will have to do it again!
But the formula for the wheel distance is incorporated with the time of the distance to produce the number of revs the wheel will have done in any given TOD time of distance!
Here it is>
Found the little program for you, although I have some better maths for this that I can send at a later date>
Proc WHFORM
global a,b,c,d,e
do
print: "Time of 1 rev=", :input a
print:"Time of distance=", :input b
c+(b/a)
d=(2680.0/((b/1000.0)*(a/100.0)))
e=(c-(c/d))
e=((int(e*10000.0))/10000.0)
print " No of Revs=",e
until 0
endp
>I am enclosing latest version of your program for your consideration.
>Please let me know your comments regarding these improvements.
> Well everything looks fine, but currently cannot run it, run out of Psions at present!
Nice to hear you have it up and running, you have done the best out of alot of people and grasped the concept and understanding the best!
Look forward to hearing from you soon
>I look forward to hearing from your and remain,
>
>Sincerely yours,
>Max
"mark anthony" <markanthony18@hotmail.com>
Subject :
Re: Hope you are well!
Date :
Fri, 8 Aug 2003 01:13:40 +0300
Reply Reply All Forward Put in Folder...InboxSent MessagesDraftsTrash Can Printer Friendly Version
Hello Mark,
How are you? Thanks for your e-mails and phone calls. I have just
looked at your files with mathematics, that you have sent on 13th of
June. I did not have time to analyze it, but it looks very impressive.
First off all, please, accept my appologies for not replying on your
e-mails. I was unable to reply, because on the way from my last trip
to Kiev I was involved into traffic accident, and suffered from it. My
car has been crashed and I, myself, got into hospital with broken leg
and concussions. So for time being I had to forget about internet, as
I was in hospital that even does not have proper telephone lines.
But good news is that I was able to win about USD 7000 during that
trip (as appeared just to cover damages from the accident :-(((). I
used my new version of the program. And despite that my notebook has
been lost in that accident, I was able to save this version on SSD. If
you are interested, I can mail you this version tommorow.
Also, Dmitry from Moscow contacted me by e-mail. He also called me
home, but I was not able to talk to him, because I was in hospital at
that time. Now he is on holidays in Crimea.
Do you have any progress with implementation of the math that you have
presented? I will be very interested to hear any news about your work.
I look forward to hearing from your.
--
Best regards,
Max
I have wrote the program for Sandor's laser sensors, to measure
timing of the ball and rotor with time resolution less then a
microsecond, the results for different balls are attached. I found
very interesting pattern in ball timings. Look at the following
For example look at one of the spins:
Ball timing: Delta T (A) Delta Delta T (C)
T (T') (T'')
5892750
6469081 0.910909911
7139709 0.906070682 1.005340896
7901820 0.903552473 1.002787009
8785062 0.899460926 1.004548888
9766355 0.899523108 0.999930872
10955749 0.891436542 1.009071387
12415708 0.882410331 1.010229041
So, let consider T as a nominal velocity of the ball (the real
velocity is 1/T - but then we would have to operate with values less
then zero which is not very convenient). Since second column is the
differences in velocity, then it estimate ball's deceleration, and
finally the last column is the difference in decelerations. We can see
that the last column is almost constant. So, we can use formula
a = C*t for calculation of balls deceleration. Let's take an average
of our third column, that is equal to 1.005318016. And let's take
timing of the first two spins, that have difference 0.910909911,
so our predicted deceleration and timings (or velocity of the ball
will be) for each spin will be:
PREDICTED PREDICTED
T' T
0.910909911
0.906091304 7139546.505 (lap 3)
0.901298186 7921583.68 (lap 4)
0.896530423 8813777.867 (lap 5)
0.891787881 9851066.812 (lap 6)
0.887070427 11009672.63 (lap 7)
0.882377927 12416163.94 (lap 8)
If you look above at real timings, then you will see that it only differs
(by not much) in 3 number (less then one percent). Considering
resolution of our timer of less then micro second, this means that
predicted timing differs from real in 10-20 millisecond. That is for
last lap of the ball (when it has not very high speed) not a big error
in terms of distance. This will be less the 10 milliliters in terms of
predicted distance.
Unfortunately it looks like T'' (our C) is differs from spin to spin.
I assume that this is because of fluctuation in temperature and
humidity, occasional dust on the rim of the wheel, moister and
temperature that the ball gets from fingers of croupier, different
spinnings, and trajectory path of the ball on the rim. But
fortunately all those factors alters value of T'' by not much, so we
can take Average value and be very good at prediction of the ball
timings and velocity. For example for next spin value of T'' was
1.007251546. But still if we would have taken C'' from our previous
spin (which is 1.005318016) we have
REAL PREDICTED REAL PREDICTED
T T T'' T''
5216705
5804232 0.8987761
6443835 6492272.099 0.900741872 0.894021679
7186639 7246024.978 0.896640975 0.889292408
7983228 8124276.779 0.90021718 0.884588154
8951649 9072790.42 0.891816469 0.879908786
10073757 10227485.12 0.888610774 0.87525417
11433659 11570729.67 0.881061522 0.870624177
So, again very close! Now, If we can calculate velocity at a given
point of time, then we also get velocity for a given distance. Next
what we need to do is when ball would reach critical velocity, i.e.
when vector of ball's kinetic energy (equal to mv^2 according to
Einstein :-) will be less the vector of g. Since we do know know
balls mass, but we can get this figure from previous spins. If we
enter total distance the ball has passed, we can easily calculate
velocity at time of drop.
This pattern exist for all balls, for following examples from other
ball's timings:
for 19 mm Ivory ball:
Average T'' = 1.003211369, so we have:
REAL REAL REAL PREDICTED PREDICTED
TIME DECELERATION T'' TIME DECELER
4966126
5393023 0.920842726
5858244 0.920586954 1.000277836 5875424.579 0.917895027
6374386 0.91902875 1.00169549 6384032.443 0.917640073
6991847 0.911688428 1.00805135 6958276.877 0.916086858
7654060 0.913482126 0.998036417 7693747.319 0.908770032
8438572 0.907032612 1.007110565 8405900.664 0.910557988
9291862 0.908168029 0.998749772 9333370.44 0.90412912
10318997 0.900461741 1.008558152 10264291.73 0.905260903
11551017 0.893340993 1.007970917 11496474.13 0.897579283
If you look at column 1 and 4 difference at the last lap is 54542 or
about less then 0.5 % and less then 10 miliseconds.
Lets take our average T'' = 1.003211369 and apply to the next spin:
REAL REAL REAL PREDICTED PREDICTED
TIME DECELERATION T'' TIME DECELER
5887929 1.003211369
6434775 0.915017075
7063647 0.910970636 1.004441899 7054993.409 0.912088024
7742762 0.912290343 0.998553413 7778879.686 0.908054538
8519499 0.908828324 1.003809321 8514424.08 0.909370021
9391454 0.907154419 1.001845226 9404260.435 0.905919084
10497122 0.894669415 1.01395488 10385898.17 0.904250537
11744901 0.893759939 1.001017584 11770640.59 0.891805499
Now we see the difference is 25739 (less then 0,25 %or less then 3
ms). Almost perfect!
The same is with the 21 mm Ivory Ball:
Average T'' = 1.002997235, so we have:
REAL REAL REAL PREDICTED PREDICTED
TIME DECELERATION T'' TIME DECELER
5161444
5548179 0.930295147
5976586 0.928319111 1.002128618 5981766.335 0.927515167
6459319 0.925265651 1.00330009 6457369.197 0.925545035
7001055 0.922620805 1.002866666 7001966.502 0.9225007
7574556 0.924285859 0.998198551 7610969.497 0.919863758
8279760 0.914827966 1.010338439 8219598.565 0.921523836
9040451 0.915856963 0.998876465 9077746.518 0.912094206
9940706 0.909437519 1.007058698 9900615.178 0.913120128
10963161 0.906737208 1.002978052 10963370.68 0.906719867
12105647 0.905623714 1.001229533 12127019.89 0.904027626
Now take above calculated T'' = 1.002997235, and apply to next spin:
REAL REAL REAL PREDICTED PREDICTED
TIME DECELERATION T'' TIME DECELER
5335085
5723343 0.932162374
6150993 0.93047464 1.001813842 6158258.861 0.929376814
6632784 0.927362176 1.003356256 6630410.654 0.927694124
7164881 0.925735403 1.001757276 7173749.572 0.92459096
7749789 0.924525945 1.001308192 7762861.619 0.922969048
8493222 0.912467495 1.013215211 8407570.362 0.921763205
9099631 0.933358946 0.977616916 9335870.295 0.909740788
10021759 0.90798741 1.027942608 9778558.149 0.93056981
10991452 0.911777534 0.995843148 11070414.03 0.905274091
12124065 0.906581415 1.005731553 12091102.87 0.909052889
Again we have very close predictions, so I would assume that this
pattern exist for all balls!
The difference only is in T''. So, considering a = C*t,
then since velocity is v = v0 + a*t => v0 + C*(t^2)
then distance is S = v*t + 0.5* a* t^2
==> S = v0*t + C*(t^3) + 0.5*C*(t^3)
==> S = 1.5*C*(t^3) + v0*t
Thus balls distance equation is 3d degree polynomial, where C =
T''(mentioned above). And balls acceleration is liner.
I am very interested to know your comments about this statistics.
--
Sincerely yours,