Pissing
Well, I hate to get in a pissing match here, but I feel I must counter your points.
>1)Beg for some Competency- Which you went on to describe as great Tech support after you tricked them into helping you.
It is not reasonable to expect that every single person on a tech support team has great and extensive knowledge of the product. It would be foolish and expensive to do that since most people calling in for tech support need help with the "basics" only. I've had basic questions answered quickly as well as a complex issue that was eventually solved by the supervisor so yes, I do consider this excellent tech support. Available 24/7 by chat, e-mail, or toll-free phone. Not many other ISPs have that.
>2)Unjustified fear of an open connection.- turn off computer when not in use.
Hardly unjustified. I believe there is a current worm working on Linux systems that opens up port and links all infected machines in a giant network. Anyone on this network can then access any other machine on it. This could easily happen through any broadband connection. Actually, it could happen through a dial-up as well. It's just far less likely.
>3)My other car is a Porsche arguement- If you need a real ISP you use the one at work.
I use the DSL connection at work but with the AOL interface. It's a little faster, but not much. It's also down occasionally and we've had to change ISP's twice because they go out of business. We then need new hardware and new settings on everyones computers. Usually takes a week to get all the bugs worked out. Later we get an invoice for the old equipment that we tried to return earlier and they refused to take it. So it's more like my other car is a mercedes that goes a little faster but spends a lot of time in the shop and costs a lot more to buy and maintain.
My point is that I see the costs, benefits, and problems with broadband and I choose to stick with my AOL dial-up service.
>4) You conclude with the concept that AOL is so bad it could be confused as a phone line problem.
Not sure how you got from point "A" to point "2" on this one. I'm just trying to point out potential problems to answer the original post. Is AOL supposed to detect phone line problems? Would DSL? I've got a friend that spent a month trying to get cable internet service working. After three cable modem changes they finally found a problem with the cable connections in the house. In this example you really can make a connection between the ISP and problem but with AOL they cannot be held responsible for phone line problems!
I think you just hate paying all that extra money every month to save a few fractions of a second to load a web page. You justify this by blindly hating the cheaper alternative.
Of course AOL is not for everyone. If you do a lot of downloading or access many web pages with extensive graphics, it could easily be worth the extra bucks for broadband. Personally, I USE the Internet. I do research, I check and write email, and I read and post on a few message boards. Duh. I don't "surf", I don't "chat", I don't download the latest song, and I don't need to pay for anything more than what I've got with AOL.
You love your broadband, right? Great. I'm happy for you. But there is no need to trash the alternative that might be perfect for someone else.