(Message Deleted by Poster)
I'll be there over a week and I wanted to find something that could break me even in hopes to find my HiLo game. Would just flat bet but I dont want to loose too much in case my game doesnt come back. I've been using a trainer for HiLo and almost there but we both know casino conditions is a different monster. Was going to use OPP but that style keeps your mind too busy to build the HiLo rythem I want. I've never used it but Ace/Five seems like the perfect fit and something I know I can do with my eyes closed. Just trying to figure out a betting system that doesnt require the 1-38 spread I keep reading is necessary. I know it doesnt work but for some reason regression has always made sense to me and I've never given up on figuring out a counting system to use it with.
Was planning on stopping at -4. Remember were talking running count so anything less can happen really quick.
Hopefully I'll be confident enough to switch over after 4 or 5 Ace/Five sessions, which is the reason for the 300 stop loss ;).
Wow, excellent data. Gonna take me a bit to absorb it all but it looks great so far. Was exactly what I was looking for. Escalators really show the weakness (and strength) of the system. I will probably hang with it for as long as it takes. Believe it or not, this specific system seems to be helping me get my game back. Maybe the ease of it and still being able to watch the flow of the cards. Thank you very much for helping me out. BTW, 20 hours sounds about right..... Hopefully most of it is with HiLo though. I'll let ya know how it turns out.
What a great post. Thanks for sharing those numbers.
You listed the rules as DOA, DAS, H17, RSA. Most decent shoe games on the strip also offer LS. Since GFUNK is rightly concerned about lowering variance while he gets his feet back under him, it is critical that he only play games offering LS IMO. Perhaps you could run those numbers again throwing in LS as a rule.
Thanks again for running them in the first place!
D
Thanks for looking out D. LS is part of one of the games but I gave him a few differnt games I was looking at. The main two are an 8 Deck game/w LS and a 6 Deck /wo LS. This is a pretty good example since I think it changes the variance something like .03 percent which just happens to work out to the same as my other 6 Deck game/wo LS. Both work out to .49 so wont matter which one I play, I should be able to use the same spread. There is also a DD game but I will only play it if HiLo comes back to me. Come to think of it, I think the Wynn has a 6 Deck with the same as listed along with LS. Guessing if the cut is the same it may drop it to .46 or .47.... Either way all games are comparible except the DD game and sticking with the spread suggested would not change other than giving a slightly elevated % +3 and slightly favorable % when negative.
Have to say, it would have been nice to have a guy like Alienated back when almost every game was .19 or better. Back then I'd be paying him well for this type of analysis.
