The other site must have seen the posts here and came up with a new entry. The short of it, he sims a game where he bets his max bet at +1 and above with full indices and compares it against the Illustrious 18 where Don starts betting one unit at +1 and ramps as the count increases. He then claims that because the I18 win rate is lower he is proven right. I just lost all respect for this guy (not that I ever had much to begin with). Any first week card counting idiot knows that a ramp wins less than putting your max bet out at +1. All you have to do to resolve this is run the same game, same pen, same rules, same max bet at +1 and just use the I18 against a full spread of indices and compare the results. And this clown tries to sell his services to the casino industry? Someone correct me if I'm wrong here.
