I’d like to ask for some informed criticism on a blackjack simulator / analysis project I’ve been building.
The site is here:
https://ether-ore.github.io/BJW/
This is not a sales post, and I’m not claiming CVData/CVCX parity. In fact, one reason I’m posting is that I do not yet have that parity, and I’d rather be candid about that.
I also want to be clear that I’m not trying to outdo CVData/CVCX. I think Blackjack Wonk may be aimed in a somewhat different direction, though I’m still trying to define that clearly myself: less toward replacing existing software, and more toward exploring questions and experiments that I want to be able to set up in my own way.
The public site lays out the simulator structure, methodology, validation work, references, and unresolved gaps.
If any experienced players or experienced users of blackjack software are willing to look it over, I’d especially value thoughts on:
- where you would investigate first if you were trying to reconcile the remaining CVData/CVCX differences
- whether the methodology/validation work looks sound or still has obvious holes
- whether there are blackjack questions current software does not handle especially well, where something like this might be useful
I’d much rather hear blunt criticism than praise.
Thanks to anyone willing to take a look.
