Those �math� guys and PhDs who performed the initial computer studies did not recognize the essential fact, which I will not reveal to you on an open board, that leads a player to win more hands then lose. Nor did they realize that the cards in their run did not reflect reality that is: If you don't get the cards you will not win
Further more, They could not and did not discover that there are crucial aspects of the game that are predictable, with reference to both current and future round action. Their betting system were based upon a surreal, random world, unreflective of reality, in which a player would never know what card would come next, let alone what cards would likely be dealt after a shuffle.
Another huge mistake blackjack�s early and even current computer researchers are doing is that of assuming they could arrive at a simple card strategy by applying generalizations, based upon millions of simulated hands, to each specific card situation
Now, The probability of what is likely to occur in a given round of action is very different from the probability of what will occur in a 100 million simulated hands of action. When you make a bet, you cannot bet your money on a collective result of 100 million sim because your actual bet rides on the results of one particular round.
Yet, this is exactly what their generalized card strategy taught you to do: to make card decisions as if were betting on collective results of millions of hands, in spite of the fact that the vast number of those rounds have nothing in common with the realities you face at any given moment. Well, this approach require you to deny what your eyes are seeing and that is: If you don't get the cards you will not win but if you get those cards you will WIN
Puiu (BMW 850)
