I found a casino with very simple shuffle(like 26 cards=
slug , and only once shuffled) but poor penetration= 50-60% in 6 or 8decks shoe game, in Asia.
I know I should play with NRS=the formula. And I realized many pros play with HILO.
I believe if the shuffle was so simple, the condition is simular
to a very good penetration game or 2decks game.
and, I
believe playing efficiency gives u a lot bigger E.V for each
tracking play. So I sticked to HIOPT1and ace sidecount.(as
Hunce recommended long time ago.)
Im quite sure this way is better than HILO-alone.
What I would like to know is if ever I picked up HIOPT2 any dramatic differece between following A.B.C
A. HIOPT1with Acesidecount.
B.HIOPT2 no sidecount
C.HIOPT2 with ACE sidecount(independent)
all with simpleNRS play
and condition is
10ES D2 DAS ARS ENHC 50%pene tration
2boxplay with 2otherplayer(1boxeach).
Im not good at simulation stuff, so I will really apreciate any kind of Mathstady for this case. Im wondering if I should pick up HIOPT2 or not.
