I am intrigued at a below post referring to computer analysis of various games. Would anyone possessing such software and computer literacy, of which I possess neither be able to assist.
I have taught myself counting from books, and use Wong Hi-lo from
Pro-BJ 1994 edition.
The game is 4 deck, S17, NoDAS, No resplits, DD 10/11 only.
I am permitted a 25:1 bet variation, unbelievable but true, but restricted by the house to a max. bet of $25. I play two hands at an average of 150 hands per hour, (300 total)
My betting structure is very simple:
$1 for counts less than +2
$25 for counts equal and above +2
based on Table 9 of Professional BJ.
(I actually use a half deck count, halving the decision no.'s in Wong's table, thus betting max. at a true count of +1 per half deck.)
I also confess to betting max close to +1 per half deck, ie +6 with 7 half decks remaining. (+5,6 & occasionally +4/5), but only one hand alone at the table, (having read Wong's writing in relation to conservative spread when one or two cards could make a significant difference to the true count of further hands) For this reason I also only play one hand at +3/3 unless I believe it to be the last round.
Although I play reasonable hours and keep accurate daily records, I have no idea how profitable this game is, as my fluctuactions are massive. ie last month I soared up $2500 in two weeks, only to go negative, only to recover at $1500 for the end of the month. I would love to know my theoretical hourly rate.
Perhaps someone could also comment on my betting structure. I realise it probably looks extremely aggressive, but I am going under the assumption that the game is -0.71% favouring the house. I am also going under the assumption that at +1 true count per half deck my edge is about 0.29 (1- 0.71). Is this a reasonable assumption?, and could someone provide me with a more accurate one please.
As I have little contact with other pro players any advice or criticism of my game would be appreciated.
