Now I realize I am playing the devil's advocate, where this is a message board posted for those players who would beat the casino, but this idea has been rumnating in my mind and I just had to get it down before I went mad, if I am not so already.
This is one of those questions preferentially for the experts, but may be useful for you who wish to boggle your minds. If you come up with the answer, I would have no problem if you steal my idea because I would much rather beat a game created by the casinos than create one for money myself.
I probably got this notion two ways, first from the fact that I am obsessed to know every card in the deck in their exact sequence so I would in effect know the outcome of every round dealt before the cards even came out (cheating), and two from the belief stated by an author I have read asserting that most players would probably still lose even if they did know the composition of all the cards in the deck to be played with extreme accuracy.
But I digress and here is my game. I guess I would call it all exposure Blackjack in that all the cards would be dealt face up including both of the dealers along with the players. So what you say,
but here's the real kicker, the cards in the shoe are also face up and the top card essentially the next card to be drawn would be exposed. Now the only unpredictability I can see is the cards in the shoe behind the top one exposed would impose, but of course they will each be seen in their own right one at a time as the top card is drawn
The table would maybe need to change its rules a little to accomodate this change, which of course gives the player a huge advantage, but my question is how much of an advantage would the house have in this situation? With sufficient amendations would it be enough to sell this gimmick, for as we all know the reason the tables do so well is because players are foolish in their actions, but still believe the game can be beat, which of course lures more players to lose their money.
