Agreed, but Old Coot and pair splitting???
But I do wish Old Coot would post some of his source codes. He may have stumbled onto some things about how like cards clump together, and how this effects player position, but the problem is he was looking for confirming this myth. It is sort of like Columbus landing in the Carribean, and supposing he had secretly determined he was nowhere near China, and deciding to secretly bury all record of his exploration.
A true story about such actually happened in Nevada, in the 1880s. Most people are familiar how much of the problem mineral residue in early gold mines on the Comstock turned out to be silver. But it is also true that most of the brownish blue flakes that used to tearup mining grinding equipment, in both gold and silver mining operations, turned out to be Platinum and Tungsten.
If a player for some stupid reason were inclined to hit 16s, and even 17s, but stand on 12s and 13s, there would be no difference in expected value. It would actually be the same as the average with DD's variety of bad players. But there might be if some stupid player were to always split 3s, or other low cards: the discards would have less clumping. If some stupid player refused to split aces and 8s: the discards would have more clumped aces and 8s (hint to people playing at Frank's table ;-). A mix of accurate basic strategy players and pair splitting philics and phobics, with various sequences would prove interesting.
But alas to investigate that we would have to advise Old Coot on current Platinum prices --if you know what I mean?