unbalanced counts

So ive been using the mentor count. My game at home is 8d, das, ls, 75%pen. I bought cvcx and have been using it to test betting ramps. I recently found that it has a strategy comparison feature. I plugged my stats is, and it tells me that the Unbalanced Zen II offers 50% better returns with the same RoR. Is this possible? That amount is HUGE. Is there a mistake in the calculations? When i say "play two hands" it MORE THAN DOUBLES the win rate for playing just one hand. I dont think this is mathematically possible.

should i switch? or is there something i haven't caught. it wouldnt be very hard, considering the only difference is that 9s are counted as zero instead of 1, so there's no TC conversion, which is the bane of my existence anyways. Any advice would be welcomed.

Unbalanced Zen is a fairly god count.
Mentor Count" is not bad at all.

I imagine that the result that you got, is EXTREMELY improbable, if not entirely implausible.

The tags for the Mentor Count are: +1 +2 +2 +2 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -1
The tags for the Unbalanced Zen Count are: +1 +2 +2 +2 +2 +1 0 0 -2 -1

These are too close to make a significant difference.

So ive been using the mentor count. My game at home is 8d, das, ls, 75%pen. I bought cvcx and have been using it to test betting ramps. I recently found that it has a strategy comparison feature. I plugged my stats is, and it tells me that the Unbalanced Zen II offers 50% better returns with the same RoR. Is this possible? That amount is HUGE. Is there a mistake in the calculations? When i say "play two hands" it MORE THAN DOUBLES the win rate for playing just one hand. I dont think this is mathematically possible.

Using http://www.qfit.com/cvcxonlineviewer.htm, I get a c-SCORE of 6 using UBZ-11 on 8 decks with 2 cut off, H17, DAS, LS with a spread of 1-8. This would represent a 50% increase from a c-SCORE of 4.

backcounting using the mentor count, $8300 bankroll

$35 every 100 hands, spreading 15-150, 5.3% RoR
avg bet=34.93
SD/hand= $53.72

Now for UBZII

$55.21 every 100 hands, same spread, 3.9% RoR
avg bet=47.98
SD/hand= $67.07

Now if i click "play two hands"
$120.45 every 100 hands, same spread, 11.4% RoR
avg bet= 107.49
SD/hand=210.77

Its S17, really not too bad of a game if you backcount it.
So does cvcx make mistakes with regards to unbalanced systems, or is it right and UBZII is clearly the better choice? I'd always thought unbalanced systems couldnt compare to balanced ones in a shoe game.

And thanks for the responses so far. I appreciate them.

Did you notice that while your average bet and SD increases using UBZII?

And, naturally, your win-rate will double when you play two hands, but did you notice your SD tripled?

If you really want to compare playing strategy performances, you should really look at the c-SCORE. This value takes win-rate and variance into consideration.