I will leave the discussion of the possible effectiveness of this "system" to those more knowledgeable than myself.
However, I do know that your manual "simulations" are meaningless due to the small size of the sample. It would literally take years to get a statistically valid result using this method.
I'm sure you have better things to do with your time. :-)=
If it works as you say then why wouldn't it work against csm's?
Since you do not use any of the information from previous rounds what difference would a csm make?
Many of them do not insert the discards back into the machine for a round or two.
That is a question for The Pro.
Good point.
Best Regards,
Crackerjack
But until I can prove to myself otherwise it isn't profitable, (and I am completely open to that possibility), it will be my method of choice.
Thanks for your concern.
Best Regards,
Crackerjack
Do you mean this hand count is your method of choice already? You can surely do what you want, of course, but this seems foolhardy to run with a system only because it has not been proven to be ineffective. (Especially one that so many have serious questions about.) Would it not be wiser to run with a system that is proven to work while evaluating this system?
Also, you stated in a previous post that you realized that penetration was important in traditional counting systems. Not having satisfactory penetration available does not mean you should adopt a system that does not require penetration, but demonstrates no reason for not needing it. KO does not require RC/TC conversion, but V&F explain in great detail why it does not.
Good luck, but I doubt there will be a prize in the Crackerjack Box.
You admit your data is limited in sample so quit referring to it as statistically signficant. Your data means nothing at this point. One need only to look at your results and see this. KO, RED 7, HiLo are all comparable counts. Yet your "data" shows the counts outperforming each other by 100%. Obviously your samples are too small. And you concede this. So don't refer to your data as "promising". Your data is nothing at this point.
