Team X-Count, AceMT vs. Team Hi Opt I, Hi-Lo

Team X-Count, AceMT vs. Team Hi Opt I, Hi-Lo

All with counting only ½ of the cards, X-Count rivals Hi-Opt I, and similarly, AceMT rivals Hi-Lo.

Question: 

What might happen to a Blackjack Team Competition Tournament when Team X-count, AceMT meets Team Hi Opt 1, Hi-Lo?  Will it be a close competition? A decisive game? A wild result?

The table below lists each system’s “raw numbers”:

Point Value and System Parameter

You're really either stubborn and stupid about this, or you're simply shamelessly promoting a worthless system. Do the simulations, get the SCOREs for Hi-Lo and ten count, and then don't ever speak about them in the same breath again.

Don

The Result Is IN: 

The winner is the ____ Team, but the losing team has launched vehement protest, claiming that the  opponent got information from a mysterious Ace Side Count.  Can you figure out which team might got that mysterious Ace Side Count information by teaming up?

Hint: Study how the Running Count of each system is tallied.

Don't think there is a software program in existence even today that could simulate X-Count or AceMT without modifications.  (It did not exist 5 years ago.) Would love to see the SCORE of Foret Lanyang's X-Count and AceMT from anyone.

All nonsense.

I spend my prep time reading the newest indices publication by Don on Hi Lo count, coupled w/hi Blackjack Attack before my next venture instead of such FOOLISHNESS by moraine,aceside, and associates.

An old timer taught me decades ago, "YOU CAN MAKE MONEY, OR YOU CAN MAKE EXCUSES, BUT YOU CAN'T DO BOTH!"

It's their perogative to  keep theorizing on BJ, but  perhaps lacking inner desire to succeed.

The Inescapable Truth:  UNLESS THE CASINO HAS STACKED THE DECK., if the deck has one surplus high card, a non-high card must be missing. Counting low cards is a complete waste of effort, ALMOST!

Play Smarter, Not Harder. That is what card counting is all about. 

I'll stop replying to the above poster and just make a general comment/warning to the community. Most of the above is utter claptrap and unadulterated nonsense. Just forget you ever read it. The mere fact that someone could say that today's simulators can't handle the count should raise a red flag. That alone is utterly ridiculous.

Don

Post-Tournament Analysis:  Team X-Count, AceMT was able to score an easy win against Team Hi Opt I, Hi-Lo because by teaming up, the team already enjoys the benefit of knowing how many surplus Aces are still left in the shoe all the time, since the difference between AceMT's RC and X-Count's RC equals to Ace Side Count's RC -- a novelty in team competitions for sure -- while Team Hi Opt I and Hi-Lo was still busy counting the little-or-no value low cards with its two "age-old, timeless systems" so to speak.

Why do you mention my aceside? I’m a mathematician myself, so it’s my interest to derive these published and posted numbers. 

Both of Foret Lanyang's X-Count and AceMT use one non-traditional method for RC-TC conversion. Moraine was unaware of the existence of any simulation program on the open market that could simulate AceMT back then (when he published his book on AceMT in 2021). Same is still true today.  Moraine would love to see the SCOREs for X-Count and AceMT from anyone. If you have the SCOREs, please post your underlying stipulations as well.  Thanks.