Ask yourself how a quantum state computer would have bounds such that it would not also link with all of the virtual particles in its vicinity?
Answer: you cannot.
The universe itself would function as a virtual quantum computer!
And given enough capacity some consiciousness would arrise. But that computer -- that God -- would be limited, even without dealing with the entropy arrow of time (see Two Gravity Research Foundation papers: Einstien is Smiling, Feynman is Laughing, and All Virtual Interactions are Virtually Relative.) to just one time space continum of possible universes. Seeing that it knew the outcome of all, it would adopt an invasive attitude strategy of dealing with what it would see as its subcomponents: us! Calvinists especially love this type of GOD! It, or the beings it conects with, would sell a theology that is basically spiritual socialism, where the highest goal is to dissolve into a heavenly collective, and to percieve the final black hole that universe would collapse into, and the ending Hawking radiation, as a higher burst of glory where all are one.
But it would never be able to see how our independence allows us to clearly percieve the other parallel universes that result from our very limits. Amoung those perceptions would be the concept of howemptiness is full of zero point energies. But most important of all would be the concept of the laws of physics themselves showing eveidence of evolving, as an alternative to the Descartian reason for the existence of a supreme being. His point was that the fact that math applies to physics is eveidence of design. But math simply is that which evolves without contradicting itself.
There is even a book entitled, The Evolution of Physics, that claims exactly that.
So the question of what is beyond the boundaries of any given parallel universe, has to be approached with that possibility in mind and with the mind that is open to what is otherwise only claimed to exist by religionists and mystics. It is easiest too to consider how the universe would tend to anyone outside to either actually be or resemble a black hold of universal size. The event horizon would exist in some way.
The order that a given universe has would have the characteristic of bringing new mass energy into existence as it expands, as a variation of cosmic inflation theory.
Now this does relate to random events like blackjack in a very fundamental and strange way. A religionist would see any gambling as a negation of GOD already knowing the ends of all outcomes, while the gambling individual would see from the above, how his perception of an outcome might move his consciousness between parallel universes (see the Edington paper on the Copenhagen 4 alternative thesises of the explanation of quantum mechanics). Without this understanding you have the artificial boundaries between claims of psychic perception and normal perceptions of reality.
There does not need to be any "new frequency" or other frequecy planes, which are used to provide bad explanations of this by new agers of all stripes. But there does need to be a very hard nosed application of such concepts if they are applied to gambling, that does not lean toward the psi just because it is more fun somehow. There needs to be a realization that accurate perception of fixed future events, is only possible with future events that are actually fixed in outcomes. There needs to be the realization that the claims of remote viewing and the like are really only claims for people being able to efficienctly data mine evidences of outcomes that are fixed, but fixed in hidden ways, and are going to be very vary rare actually compared to the ability to exploit the spectrums of outcomes analysis that counting and other methods use.
I hope this helps. If not it will be fun to hear the screems from the clones!
