Non counters / Strategy players > CSM's

If you're not a counter, it shouldn't make any difference at all. At CSMs, you play faster, so you're going to lose your money more quickly.

Don

If they were streaky they would be exploitable.  I doubt that they are streaky.

The more decks there are the more streaky any game will be by definition. You have more variance in getting high or low counts.  An autosuffle is essentially endless decks making the game much more streaky. The problem is you have no idea which way the streak will go at any time so no way to exploit it.  By this I mean on 8 decks or auto shuffle you will have far more times where you win say 4 or 5 times in a row or lose 4 or. 5 times in a row than on say 1 or 2 decks, but after you lose once or twice you have no idea if you are gonna go into one of those streaks or just go the other way. While the # of streaks is higher you';re not gonna win or lose 5 in a row often but it happens enough more often that you are more likely to bust out.

And with a BIG enough bankroll they might be beatable. Im not sure how to model it but they may be......

There have been methods for beating some CSM's, but only for a little, and those methods could be considered dark arts that are not openly discussed. 

For a non-counter they might be a little better than a shoe game, because they won't have a counter Wonging in and out on them. A low-stakes counter jumping in and out of a table of basic strategy whales might actually be making money for the casino. 

Have they come out with new shufflemasters that can deal the muck immediately as opposed to having a 10-15 card bleed?

I've been to more than a few casinos where they allow 2-3 hands to go before mucking.

There obviously exists a bet strategy wherein you count those 2-3 hands and bet accordingly.

Whether you can come up with a system that's worth it or not, who knows.

Whether you'd get a chuckle and a backoff if you're flipping between betting $25 and $500 10% of the time is another story.