The win rate part doesn’t make sense to me. During deck 7, the win rate is 1.626%; during deck 2, the win rate is 0.743%. I’d imagine that the win rate % should increase with increasing dealing penetration, but this is not the case in the above table.
The general trend should be, a positive HiLo true count is more valuable at a deeper penetration level. Right?
P.S. I thought about this again and kinda got what you meant. You fixed the KO Running Count at +2 to compare the win rate % numbers, but I fixed the HiLo TC at +2 to compare them. This might expain the inverse % trend in your above table.
by: aceside
Not sure, but the totals at all count levels for each deck level does follow the pattern you mention. However, at a particular count level it often does not follow that pattern. By the way this was K-O count. 10-1 bet spread starting at $10, max bet at +4 and up, 8 units at +2, 9 units at +3, dealt about 6.5 of 8 decks.
This is the total for all counts at each deck level for the run above, then total for everything:
8 7 6 5 4 3 2
net $4,395,105 $4,174,810 $-2,428,125 $1,467,975 $7,029,505 $16,808,925 $15,034,505
bet $742,817,420 $745,328,350 $857,118,465 $1,079,209,095 $1,525,080,030 $2,140,249,735 $1,547,880,785
% -0.592% -0.560% -0.283% 0.136% 0.461% 0.785% 0.971%
Total
net: $29,342,870
bet: $8,637,683,880
0.340%