High-Low with one deck

When using the High-Low system with one deck with rule of 6, by the time you get to the last deal, you are at or below one half of the deck. Should you make an adjustment in your true count when you get to this point? Up to his point, I've treated my running and true counts as the same. As an example: A/2 vs. 6, I would normally double if count is -3 or above. Should I adjust it at this point to -6 or above? Another example, hard 8 vs. dealer 6. Normally, I would double if the count is +2 or above. Should I adjust that to +1 and above? I do have Professional Blackjack by Wong. Any other suggested books on the high-low system that address issues like this? Thanks

By current convention, the True Count is normalized to a full deck equivalent. This was not always the case. The counts of Lawrence Revere were normalized to the half-deck. The Uston counts were normalized to the half-deck. In the mid-seventies the counts of Stanford Wong and the Canadian psychologist/system peddler calling himself Lance Humble popularized the full deck convention.

The greatest majority of blackjack publication is intellectual plagarism.

You can do yourself a favor by acquiring (and comprehending):

Beat the Dealer by Thorp, both the '62 and '66 editions. Note how Thorp handled depth-of-deck in his version of Dubner High-Low.

Playing Blackjack as a Business by Revere. This book created most of the system players in the 70's. Yes, it's dated, but the verities and truisms it contains endure. Ignore his bankroll advise as fatally optimistic.

Million Dollar Blackjack by Uston.

The Theory of Blackjack by griffin. This is not light reading, but you will learn why some departure decisions (like A6) are hardly worth knowing.

And investigate all the information available within this website.