I wonder how efficient the dealer's rules are.
Everyone knows the dealer stands if and only if his total is "hard" and at least X, or his total is "soft" and at least Y. And everyone knows that X is always 17, and Y is always 17 or 18.
What if you chose other values? And what if you then determined an optimal basic strategy for them, and compared EVs? Does {X=17, Y=18} yield a worse EV for its corresponding BS than any other set of values and corresponding BS? In other words, is {X=17, Y=18} the best possible set of rules?
I'm guessing this is indeed the case, but I'd like to know if anyone has, perchance, bothered to investigate this. Since I don't own a copy, feel free to slap me across the face with the Griffin book if I'm asking a question he already answered.
Just wondering, for my own edification....