Something I see on the BJ tables continually in Reno are what I term the 'counter hoppers'. Now I know from all the reading that I've done this is the correct procedure as Negative counts are not in a player's favor.
But it's so obvious to the pit and 'eye in the sky' because it's now the 'counter's vanguard' or winning conservative play that I'm sure the EYE has studied and catalogued too. I mean if you were a dedicated Pit or Eye personell wouldn't you read a few books on your off time to improve your skills and insure that you'd keep your job?
Isn't it better **for camoflodge** purposes to sit through a few negative deals and play rather than change tables or sit out the remainder of the deck?
This kind of response is so blatantly obvious to me that the player is reading Bj data and has to be noticed greater by the industry.
*** That's all we need is a few more *Novice Counters* to give further reason for changing the rules and decreasing the odds for the player!***