Challenge to the Anti-Progressionists!

I just posted a message on bjmath,
http://www.bjmath.com/bin-cgi/bjmath.pl?read=4309,
in which I propose a simple model for which progressive betting is useful. The only (bold) assumption is that the deck composition change can be described by Gaussain (rather than Poisson) random process, which I believe is reasonable. Otherwise the model is pretty realistic.

If you don't understand the "scientifice method", please ignore the message.

~Jack

Stop posting.

That'll be a very hard challenge to accept, especially when it comes from a person who doesn't even understand simple equations.
~Jack

I dont' know who the heck is FS, but you don't even have a half-brain to make intelligent comments? If you have nothing constructive to say, please don't say anything.
~Jack

FS was a big progressionist who use to haunt these pages but a bear caught him in the woods and devoured him. Too bad because his wife was going to divorce him and take the house. Now thats negative EV for ya! Talk to you over at CC.COM.

Let me tell you, that Mr. Jacobson is along Mathprof and our host,
one of the best mathematician we've the pleasure to count among us.
Now, I've realized what a waste of time, has been for me, dealing with you at bjmath. What a lunacy, Jesus.

Z

an expert in other realms. In the not to distant past, he demonstrated very poor judgement in telling a casino he was a counter. Now he is showing the same poor judgement in trying to muzzle postings by progression players. Need I say more?

Come on windy you cant believe that. Have you ever had an in depth conversation with the mayor or are you just shooting from the hip...acting on your senses... seeing the streak...stickng pins in the voodoo doll. Come on. The mayor has the education and the balls to play well known and sucessfull at that. ... sorry knowing the math is part of it. Hey cant we all just get along.

...is an odd character with his heart in the right place. He has provided a lot of useful tools to the cc community. Try and make allowances for his occassional erratic behaviour.

I think "erratic" behavior is an understatement though -- I am downright psychotic.

--Eliot

very impressive. Now I feel intimidated. I will still criticize, but now with full knowledge of whom I'm dealing with. Again, congratulations on your impressive past.

Eccentric, instead of the term "psychotic".

I don't think your psychotic. You really can't be a full-blooded Math Professor without being a little eccentric.