I have read some discussions about CSM, but no conclusion. Whether if a BJ using CSM is not worthful to play for a counter.
Straight counting is useless vs csm's. People have beaten these things using a variety of methods over the years using other methods, but that requires detailed knowledge of these devices and/or procedural aberrations.
CBJN only covers North America.
A couple of years ago or so, Garry Baldy did a fairly comprehensive fill in of Moscow on trackjack, and I believe they now have some cities in Europe. I don't know if they cover anyother parts of Asia now.
Problem is, trackjack has not had continual reporting resources. They have in the past, mass updated the report dates of hundreds of reports at a time on a weekly basis to make the reports look fresh. This is a huge dis-service to the subscribers because they have been led to believe that reports are only days old, when they are in reality years old. I don't know if they are still practicing this tactic.
Parker has taken over trackjack. He is supposedly hiring paid reporters to report on conditions. I hope he is successful.
"Parker's mission will be take Trackjack to a new level by expanding our paid reporter network, adding more timely news, etc."
Have any reporters been hired yet?
Anybody heard anything on this?
Any of you been hired?
T-Man cannot be trusted when it comes to TJ. He has been attacking it for years for personal reasons. He even got caught posting under an alias on this forum and claiming he was a newbie and a dissatisfied customer of TJ. He also admitted that he has tried to harm RGE and even posted that your PC may be attacked if you read advantageplayer.com.
I expect by pointing this out, I will again become a target of his false accusations.
I like Parker.
If anybody is capable of bringing trackjack back to being a reliable service, he is.
I hope he does succeed and turn trackjack around. I said I hope that he does hire paid reporters as promised. I provided the link to the post where Viktor said that paid reporters were going to be hired so that nobody could think that I was making it up.
I asked if somebody has heard of any developments. I cannot read the subscription pages at rge or on trackjack. Maybe there have been some developments about which I have not heard.
I asked if any reporters have been hired for trackjack. Subscribers to CBJN can see who is paid to report on which areas. The CBJN reporters are reputable members of the community. Subscribers can discuss the reports with the reporters on CBJN.
Stanford Wong states what areas he needs a report for, and says how much he is willing to pay for the reports. Is any of this being done on trackjack now?
If positive things are happening on trackjack, the community should be informed about them.
He also admitted that he has tried to harm RGE and even posted that your PC may be attacked if you read advantageplayer.com.
I was trying to figure out this newest claim Norm has fabricated against me, and did some searches. Searching "all words" on "all pages" for viktor and computer on Arnold's site yielded this post:
In the past I used to be a poster/writer over at advplayer/rge [under a different handle] until I had a conflict over there. Later on my computer was hacked and I'm nearly certain it was viktor (I don't have 'physical' evidence, but all the circumstantial evidence points to him). I"m curious if anyone has experienced anything similar? Thanks, Pajek
I guess that is to what Norm is referring. Well, it wasn't me. Must be somebody else who posted and wrote at rge and had a conflict.
It's not that exclusive of a club.
trackjack listed CSMs when I was editor. Parker has had some discussion recently asking whether he should continue to do so.
Colorado's blackjack games were also listed on trackjack. State law limits blackjack to $5 max bet, making the game useless. I only updated the state once every few months because the chore was useless and time consuming.
The leader and owner of this site, Stanford Wong visited China just over a year ago. (I don't think he was trying to find his roots, though.)
You could locate one of his posts, open it, and there is an option to send an email to the poster. Maybe he can give you some information or advice on how to get some.
Look at the response to the post you linked to. It is from you and says "He has software that tracks people who go to his site. The guy is a paranoid whacko. You can get software that will tell you what he's doing." And look at the basis for this post. The poster's mother-in-law had her credit card stolen. You convinced him it was Viktor and he posted that on both this forum and BJF anonymously. Just one incident of years of your obsession to destroy RGE.
I am neither of those two people. I am not either pajek or thongman. I had absolutely nothing to do with those two posts.
You have accused me of being a felon, a thief, a liar, falsifying unemployment insurance, income tax evasion, a failure at my profession, and many other things.
Look at this thread. Everyone else here is having an intelligent discussion.
All you can do is try to break it up by making baseless and false accusations, as usual.
You again, for no reason, posted that TJ is a fraud. Now you act as if I started this.
1. You post that mass updates are fraudulent. According to your logic, CBJN is a fraud since it mass updates each month. TJ was changed so that the casinos are checked and then updated at one time. You presume that this means fraud. It is an incorrect presumption, not �proof� as you state.
2. You post that Sam Kumar is Viktor. Your �proof� is that he doesn�t post often and never bothered to ask for bypass moderation. Well, extremely few BJ players post to these boards. I estimate about 2% of my BJ users has ever posted to any BJ forum anywhere. BJ21 is not the center of the BJ universe. This means nothing. Again, you presume this means fraud. Sam is one of my users and I know that he is real and that he has posted.
3. You post that no one is paid. Your �proof� is that no one answers your call to come forward. Why would anyone publicly respond to you and submit themselves to your attacks? Why would you assume that they even read your posts or BJ21 at all? Again, you presume fraud with no proof. Again, I know your claim to be wrong.
4. You falsely accused me of outing my customers in an effort to harm me. Your �proof� is that I called you Mike. But, you posted that you are Michael Belguard. And that�s not even your real name. I didn�t even know you were a user. Again, you falsely presume that I out my customers from my records. This is an egregious, false accusation which Syph repeated on another forum.
You have a long record of presuming fraud based only on ridiculous interpretations of events and colored by your hatred of Viktor. What you call �proof� is simply long strings of inferences selecting only the worst possible of many conclusions. All because you had a business dispute years ago. You carry around a �red book� containing all of your paranoid �proofs� showing it to anyone that will listen. You have even gone so far as to post here under an alias pretending to be a newbie and dissatisfied customer. Outright fraud. And that is not a presumption on my part, you admitted it.
The purpose of my post was simply to warn a user that you are not an objective source of information. This is an information forum. I will continue to warn people when they get bad advice. No matter how many false accusations you make against me.
This obsession is harmful to newbies, to you and to the BJ community as a whole. You had a business dispute. One of a hundred thousand that occur every day. Get over it.
>Look at this thread. Everyone else here is having an intelligent discussion.
Maybe I should post some nonsense just to refute this.
I don't like being included in other's fights, and the use of "everyone" suddenly says I am part of this. Leave me out, thanks.
I recall the first generation shuffle machines that had two metal bars that actually tried to mock the way a human would shuffle -- it tried to riffle the cards, but usually big clumps of cards 20 or 30 thick would snap through the riffle untouched. We're talking 1996 or so here (10 years ago). These old machines were very weak.
I am not familiar with the structure of CSM,as well as the theory of that.But I know if the face card be distributing average in the deck, we will have no chance to use any counting system. that's right?