If I am counting and the count I would stand on 16 vs 10 when the count indicated and this is also when I would most likely have more than the minimum bet out.
Also correct basic strategy is to stand on 3 card 16 vs 10 (single deck anyway)
The play is so close would it be good cover to just stand on 16 vs 10 all the time?
All the Discussions I have seen are for the basic strategy calculation without regard to positive counts and larger bets versus the negative counts and smaller bets when your technically wrong.
I would give up some advantage but the play is so close added to the fact that when I had a higher count and larger bet out it is the correct play.
Has anyone calculated the actual hit you take using this as cover considering the fact that you would be correct with higher counts and with more money on the table vs the little % in expectation you lose by not hitting on low bets in low counts?
It seems like cheap cover to me.
