Wong on Craps

Norm Wattenberger recently (about an hour ago) posted on another board, "95% of recent posts made by Stanford are on the Craps page."

For those of you who do not have Greenchip access, Stanford's posts on the Craps Page comprised 28.2% of all of his posts for the last 30 days.

For the last 90 days, it was 28.6%.

For the last 180 days, it was 31.5%.

These figures do not consider his posts on CBJN, which are deleted every month, and his strong participation on the weekly chats. This would, of course, make the percentages even smaller.

Relax a little would you? He was just joking and I'm sure you've seen exaggeration in a joke before haven't you? There have been recent releases of books on craps here and there have been recent posts of the month on craps and this is theoretically a BJ/21 page. It's hard to deny that there has been a minimal but noticable shift to encompass craps here. I can't speak for him but I understood, as I'm sure most did, that Norm's post was just a cynical joke regarding that minor shift.

Besides, I really don't think anyone here cares about Norm's jokes or your opinion so just relax, you're looking pathetically obsessed with Norm...

This whole thread is totally irrelevant to anything that this page is about and should be busted anyway.

What Norm stated is clear hyperbole -- its meaning is that SW posts a great deal on the craps page, which is intuitively obvious to everyone on GC.

That you would take the time to make a post such as this is a clear sign of mental illness. I suggest you seek help. I am serious. Get help.

You went to the trouble to calculate these figures?

Copy and paste your search criteria, click on each page and run it, jot down the numbers as you go, and wring 'em through a calculator.

Took me 13 minutes to do it, and three minutes to write the post.

I just felt that anyone who was considering subscribing to Greenchip should know real numbers, and not be mislead.

1) What percentage of your posts were about Norm and/or Trackjack?

2) What percentage of your posts recently have actually had anything to do with BJ?

I guess I wouldn't want any one to be misled about your biases ;)

p.e. I still think this thread is a waste of space...