I believe if one were truly successful as a BJ player, such analytical skills and temperament would serve more lucrative in another endeavor. Maybe you enjoy being a non-conformist, maybe you couldn't graduate college, or maybe you have some handicap which allows you to succeed in this but not in the mainstream. But, one thing you must have had was available money and you chose blackjack. Why? This is a why of curiosity, not criticism. You don't have to be a pro either, just an advantage player who supplements his income. We are a rare breed. It takes a lot of money and free time to do this, and even more if you have a family. Chances are you don�t live close to a casino of your choice either. I have played regularly now for a good 7 years and have only spotted a handful of counters. Of course, I have probably seen more but they weren�t revealed to me. Too much is written about the how of blackjack, but not the why. Just about every book author doesn�t play for a living, but advocates play or they wouldn�t be selling it (in good faith). I think the sociological look is potentially interesting and untapped. I know the psychology of gambling has been studied, but not to the extent of the BJ advantage player, which is different.
I don't do it for financial security, I have that. It has taken years for me to develop into a good player, but a true pro I�ll never be. I did it back then for the mistake that it was easy money. I do it now because I take pride in owning the skill that has taken me so long to invest in; I don't even have to win money. I enjoy the attention the pit gives me if I'm about to be backed off or barred. I feel like I am an elite player and above every other gambler. I don�t like the fact that I am denied action, but I can�t deny this situational feeling. I guess subconsciously it�s a revealing reward for all this effort and work when we are supposed to be so reticent. This is why I really play.
Dave

