Rules for both tables - DD, DAS, DOA, RSA, H17.
Table 1 - 50-55% pen head to head, fast dealer.
Table 2 - 60-70% pen 4 slow play
Is the tradeoff of the slower speed offset by the benefit of the deeper penetration? How do you quantify the effects of these two variables?
Without specifying your system and betting strategy it's hard to quantify your ev and DI. One game is terrible and the other poor--- at best. Give me the data and I'll run a BJRM sim for you.
I don't have HiOpt. II on my BJRM. I have Hi Opt. I and I'm afraid to give you data using it. I can tell you this---if you can get 200 hands per hour heads up on a 50% penetration game, the hourly ev will be good but your standard deviation per hour will be significantly greater than a good 75% penetration game at 100 hands per hour. I guess it all depends on your tolerance for pain! Ian Anderson's UG has a great hourly ev but the standard deviation is astronimical! He loves it.
