The official Clark Cant watch

search, back 60 months here, search for "zombie." He has a link htmled.

I've tried many times, but it defeats me to keep trying to read Cant's posts. I just can't follow the gobbledygook that spews through most of his posts. Is there a reader's guide to Cant's prose?
Dizz

I was involved in think tank work in grad school that conclusivley demonstrated that any good such theory by its very nature must include, account for and control for "theoretical hogwash" as a covariate and thus I have to take exception to the claim that this theory of everything is complete in that the reflexive nature of Cant's discourse {P = person goal= be understood > Person =Cant, thus = Cant be understood} This is of course a subset of the well known Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle whereby Cant cant (aka Cant squared) be able to know himself as both knower and the known (Dewey, 1955) simultaneously causing reflexive anomia.

All I'm saying is he must account for the effect of theoretical hogwash if he is to satisfy me with this "so called theroy".

perturbed but unscooped (but pooped),
jack

lets see him print that stuff in some refereed journal !! :-/

If a group of connected letters makes a word found in a dictionary, probably it is the word Cant intends, but not necessarily.

If a group of connected letters cannot be found in a dictionary, try inserting a random letter, or deleting a random letter, or inverting two letters, until you make a word. That word might be the word Cant intends, but probably not.

When you reach a period you probably have reached the end of a sentence, but maybe not.

When you have a group of words ending in a period and that group of words makes sense to you, you might understand what Cant is talking about in that sentence, but maybe not.

If the group of words ending in a period does not make sense to you, it probably makes no sense to anyone else either except to Cant himself, and maybe not even to him.

Any questions?

Code Man

Stanford,

I've never seen you point out a typo or misspelled word on these boards before. Is this a new task you're taking on? Whose job was it before?

Oh. Never mind. :)

...as a place to begin. It might be of some use to play Joe Cocker or James Brown music when attempting to decipher.

there is aslo a useful book by Theodore Reik called "Listening with the Third Ear" if you would prefer a more psychoanalytic approach to Cant. this actuall works fairly well, ie just think of the whole thing as one big free association.

jack