I wasn't trolling (I just found out what that meant this morning) Because this is an open board I was putting messages in the message and hoping that Clarke Kent could see through the very simple straightforword comment to the question that was below the words. There are somethings that you just can't say on an open board. Do the same thing on other sites. Sometimes things are not always as they appear.I was not trailing bait in the water. I keep an open mind. From what I can see ALL these experts have something to offer. Call it a quirk but I think Clarke Kent is brillant. Even more surprising I think Patterson was on to something. Yet, without Wong, Standford and a hosts of others Pattersons ideas are worthless IMHO. I liken it to creating embroidery. You can use one stitch and one color of thread but it is not the same as using many different stitches and many different colors of threads. It is something like going into war with only a 45. Yeah it can kill--- but I would rather have an arsenal of weapons. Flexibility is absolutly neccesary in this game. It seems like a simple game but all these books are being read for a reason. It is a challenging game and I am trying to figure out how to win at it without cheating of any kind. With nothing but my simple, simple mind. I appreciate All help I receive! Isn't that what this board is for?
