Playng Strategy Dilema

The skilled shuffle trackers says that a shoe is truely randomed after 120-180 shuffles.So in this time the game should be a variation on a theme (like in music) and if in 3-4 shoes the dealer is rarely busting when his upcard is a low card that means the game will go on like this long time.Then my question is:
Should I make a small alteration of the basic strategy to adapt to the game at that time?

"The skilled shuffle trackers says that a shoe is truely randomed after 120-180 shuffles."

Only the glue sniffing ones.

"So in this time the game should be a variation on a theme (like in music) and if in 3-4 shoes the dealer is rarely busting when his upcard is a low card that means the game will go on like this long time."

Yyyyyyyeah, right!

"Then my question is:
Should I make a small alteration of the basic strategy to adapt to the game at that time?"

Could anyone really stop you?

ETF

The skilled shuffle trackers says that a shoe is truely randomed after 120-180 shuffles.

Don't know where you got that figure. The generally quoted figures are seven shuffles for a single-deck, nine for eight decks. These figures are a little misleading based on a Persi Diaconis study that was nothing to do with blackjack. Because in blackjack suits and court cards (other than being valued 10) have no purpose it is easier to randomize a deck for practical purposes.

So in this time the game should be a variation on a theme (like in music) and if in 3-4 shoes the dealer is rarely busting when his upcard is a low card that means the game will go on like this long time.

No discernable correlation exists between dealer busting and the shuffle.
It sounds like you have been got at by Patterson/Davis/Benson or other clumping guru?

It is hard to tell exactly what method of exploitation the questioner might attempt. GBV already pointed out how wrong he is on the number of shuffles to totally randomize things. I have a post up here now that relates to how seemingly near noise information can be exploited, where you missed totally seeing how one set of hole card prediction accuracies is really higher because it really deals with TWO predictions, NOT just one!

You are almost certain to be correct, but you CANNOT invoke the image of Jerry Patterson, just because someone is trying to do what JP is so near absolutely wrong at!