Optimal Wong Out Question(Long)

I posted this question on another popular board but received limited response. I also emailed the author and received no response. I use Brh I Running for 6 deck. This is an unblanced, level 3 running count system. The author has detailed betting tables for various games. He also has a wong out point to choose of -8(28.21% hands played), -24(73.74% hands played), -28(82.67% hands played) and play all tables. How would you use lets say the -24 wong out #? I understand balanced true count systems for wonging but this is different. Would you play a certain number of cards/decks and leave if the -24 is reached? Since the running count should( on average) decrease by 4 for each deck dealt, could you lower the -24 by 4 each deck seen and leave if that number is reached? One poster suggested to true count every deck and use that. How would you TC an unblanced RC to correspond with HiLO? At 0 the running count is @ the pivot which equals +2 in HiLo. What would equal say a -1, -1.5 and -2.0 in this unbalanced count? The initial running count is -24.

You`re stuck with me.

:)

With a balanced count, the general rule of thumb when playing shoes is to avoid all negative counts (provided you can jump on another table).

So for the most part, look for greener pastures when your RC goes even slightly negative.

With an unbalanced count, such as your Unbalanced Zen (am I the only one that giggles at that name?), you`re correct...

You want the count to be rising about 4 points per deck.

This is pretty easy to pull off in practice. at a half-full table (3 people and dealer), every round should find your count increasing by about 1 point. If not, start looking for another table.

This might sound a little vague for those weened on optimal wong out points and penetration levels.

Screw `em.

Shove the money out in positive counts, skip over the negatives, and you`ll get the lions share of your possible EV.

Best,
Syph