Final words on this, and no more interviews. Happy now?
"Your insinuation that Mr. Stanton would lower himself to post under an assumed name is both ludicrous and unfounded, I am not taking sides but your venom should not be directed at a gentleman of senior years.You would be well advised to apologise unreservedly to your betters and cease this ego trip you have launched yourself into."
It is a fact, that Mr. Stanton doesn't like me, for some reason. I have no intention on apologizing, and here's why. About a month ago, there was some posters on JP's site, who posted under other people's names, writing posts below a retarded's level. I had continuously written on the board, questioning JP's strategies, and asking why on earth people followed it. When I finally gave up posting (note that I was NOT the person who posted under other people's names!), since everybody's allowed to have a mind of their own, regardless of what other people claim, the "false-poster" quit his "project" some weeks after. Everyone on the page were glad he'd left, but wondered where he's gone. Stanton wrote a post, which insinuated that I was the false poster, posting under other people's names. Since that event (not the only one), explains what Stanton thinks of me. He's always quick on giving me cocky remarks on many things that I write. Since I cannot tell, why some one else would have anything against me (since I haven't said anything to upset anyone, nor to provoke). If anyone's got a problem with me, or my posts, then it is the person in question who's got the problems.
"As for your pathetic 'interviews' if any adults are impressed it is they that are of restricted intelligence."
I don't get it. First you push me down. Then, when I reply, you apologize. Now, you put me down, for the second time. Now, that's what I define as "restricted intelligence". There are many people, who claims to appreciate my interviews. Though, if nine persons praise my interviews, and one puts it down, I don't hear the positive remarks, only the negative critisism. As a concequence of yours, and a few other negative persons, I will from now on NEVER post any more interviews on www.bj21.com. I prefer posting them, where they're appreciated.
I must say, that I am very disappointed in this page. The tune is very negative and cocky (at least among a few), which affluence the others. The main board has turned more into a Jerry Springer show. I am very disappointed to say, that I will no longer turn to this page to get answers, nor discussions on blackjack, unless a major change will take part.
"When you finally get some real life casino experience then and only then can you converse with your betters and superiors."
So, you're saying that my theorethical skills are not enough, in order to discuss blackjack with the superior authors and players?
"Baggins (96) -- Sligo Prince -- 27 June 02, 1:55 a.m.
Forget not (67) -- Sligo Prince -- 16 May 02, 7:58 a.m.
Billy Boy (70) -- Sligo Prince -- 16 May 02, 12:44 a.m.
500 Hours (89) -- Sligo Prince -- 15 May 02, 10:49 a.m."
So, how come these results do not appear when I do the search? Sligo Prince's posts, the last six months, only the above result. Veeery strange.