You can do better than that
Ok .. one bad conclusion at a time ..
"You feel the casinos are justified only allowing losing players the ability to play .. "
Of course not; it's not what was said. So I could ask you .. You feel the casinos should only allow APs to gamble? Of course you don't.
".. which in itself may explain why you have never had any first hand knowledge of a barring."
Your red badge of courage does not lend credibility to your argument. Casinos have barred plenty of losers along the way.
"Should you ever become a winning player .. "
Come on now .. stick with the conversation. Talking down to me just shows you have no real argument to make. I'm up life to date. So what? Is there a magic 'cummulative hours played barrier' I have to achieve before having an opinon?
" .. and experience the harrassment the casinos dish out you may have a very different opinion of the scum bags."
Let me remind you that I have said repeatedly the casino has no right to physically abuse you. If they do you should not take it lying down. If the harrassment and intimidation is to much to handle then give it up. Nobody's twisting your arm to go back.
But they do have the legal right to do a lot of other crap: pref shuffle, deal short shoes, verbally harrass you, stare you down, kick you out, tell their peers, etc. Get over it. Better gamblers than you (I'm guessing here) have dealt with it.
"If the casinos can't accept that winners are part of the risk when they choose to enter the gaming industry then they shouldn't be allowed to exist."
They do accept it. You are still playing, no? Making some money to I bet. So your problem is what again? Oh yea, they won't let you turn them into your personal ATM while keeping the riff raff out.
(Sorry, that was pretty sarcastic, I admit.)
BTW, since you brought it up .. what is the worst barring you have had? Get busted up? Have your arm twisted? I really am curious what damages you have suffered at the hands of a casino?
Have a good weekend.