Info on this man.....................

"[Doug Grant] unfortunately has family wealth that supports his habits and attorneys that have been able to threaten those who go into details."

There used to be a Doug Grant FAQ website, but not any more. I guess lawyers have seen to it -- or the threat thereof.

Clarke Can't's evil twin brother.

Both rail against the card counter's historic advantage and spew meaningless posts on the internet, tilting at windmills. Doug Grant single-handedly closed down two newsgroups by flooding the boards with endless drivel about how the modern casino game was unbeatable. Clarke's prolific postings about the floating advantage are comparable in lack of content and excess of compost. Doug Grant once sued the Atlantic City gaming commission to have all casinos use 20 deck shoes exclusively.

This is not a healthy mind at work.

His passion for the game of blackjack became a narcissistic vendetta to destroy all the hope and pleasure people find in the game. Bitter and confused, he lashed out at anyone and everyone indiscriminately..

Seeking attention and an audience, he repeated himself over and over again until the frustrated community decided they would rather have no message board at all than have him participate.

See a pattern here?? Both are to be ignored at all costs.

I wonder if Clarke ever even plays the game of blackjack in live casinos.

It figures that he would be the one to answer your questions about Doug Grant, because for Clarke he is the greatest model of how to ruin a good message board.

I simply feel a need to post when ML keeps posting his redactive reversion to the mean nonsense.

I'd like to see Doug try and sue Google.

very informative, I now get the picture albeit from one side.The reason I made the original inquiry was, in fact that I had found the original 'Doug Grant speaks' and am interested in his approach contained in the paper.I am now keen to hear your thoughts on the method, as to if there is any substance or possibly if any sims have been run to verify or not.Thanks for help. BB.

Actually I thought it might be a pun that was a cross between the mathematician and the character played by Dustin Hoffman. You seem pretty quick to critize everyone MT. Haven't you ever made a mistake?
A word of advise for free MT and something they taught us in Enginnering School. People don't care how much you know until they know how much you care.

My ID "MT handed" is an obvious indication that I have made mistakes..inter a la leaving the casino BROKE....and while i get the twitch out of my neck thinking of a response in jest....i have none except that it seems there are a lot of Queens left in this deck.

Lastly, sounds like you went to an engineering school for the kind, possible you were enrolled in "Environmnetal Engineering" that is what I would guess...I could go on, but i'll stop there, I'm sure the wheels in your head know where I would go next.

YES IT WAS A JOKE...I am no one who cares much for Reiman's work, ok..geeze

I bookmarked the link. (The one I had in mind has indeed disapperaed. It was put up by a "Ken", on his personal website.)

I am now keen to hear your thoughts on the method, as to if there is any substance or possibly if any sims have been run to verify or not.

Most people thought that was actually a good post (read on in the Google thread). Grant's sims unfortunately couldn't be trusted however, since he falsified results on numerous occassions. No one followed up since it is unwise to follow the letter of any one's personal cover approach, you need to tweak it to adjust for your own betting levels/style and run your own sims.