Comments
Here are my thoughts: I would never question his ability to do so and I would take his word on it, would Mr. Wong do us the courtesy of some feedback on that statement.
This was raised on GC a few years back. Wong said that he was not actually leading a team but that he was there. I very much doubt he'll discuss it on a free open forum, maybe if you discuss it on GC he will respond. In any case it has little relevance here since the Mirage machines operated very differently from modern devices.
Also, does he feel the new machines that are currently in use are still exploitable?
He said something to the effect that the King csm would be tough to beat so my guess is no. I agree with that, the latency in the King isn't strong for it to be beaten that way.
If CSMs are exploitable as is claimed, why hasnt someone documented a precise method and how-to.
Read the article again, there are a dozen patents filed on these devices. There is no generic brand of csm. Each needs to be attacked on its own terms. A method that could beat the Shufflestars manufactured in Austria wouldn't work on the King csm and vice versa. In addition study the King csm patent and you'll see the latency level can be adjusted for each individual machine, so you'd need to clock each individual machine to determine precisely what was going on inside and exploit any weakness.
You cannot get any more precise than my article when discussing csm's in general. However, tell me about a specific machine and I can give you a specific method.