AOII vs. HOII Insurance

"I was banned because I spoke up for the conservative viewpoint on the Politics page without getting politically correct, pre approvalfor my comments from the PC mob's weeny committee (they, of course, were free to insult me with anything they wanted with no such speech requirement). It appears that free speech only applies if they agree with you. I regularly challenged the Blame America First contingent. I believe the PC weenies first became enraged when I mentioned the obvious fact that the only people upset with America's progress against terrorism were the terrorists and most liberals. I also complained about their PC ideology being Marxist (that would be Groucho)."

I was a fairly regular contributor to the politics pages for close to a year, ending last December. Based on my experience, your statements are far from reality. While there may be a slightly to moderately higher number of left of center posters than right, there are a number of regular conservative posters who are well respected, regardless of political orientation. I suspect sour grapes on your part.

laotse

....and you blew it big time.

All you can do is try to impress us with your ignorance.

The TRUTH regarding your green chip allegations is quite evident. All Stanford Wong has to do is open the pages for everyone to read for themselves. He won't as I believe it would embarass all the whiners. It appears to me that he made a business decision choosing to protect the weeny crowd as they outnumber me. His email to me mentions his interest in "selling green chips" and says nothing about doing what is right.

Back to your sandbox.

Your words above reflect your f**king "know-it-all" mentality, which ain't much, BTW.

Just in case you can't get it through your thick, dimly-lit skull, you managed to piss off not just the leftists on the page, but a lot of the conservatives as well. There were posters who stood up for you, and you spat in their faces with your arrogance.

And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure you out....you could have been a real contributor to the page, but instead, you CHOSE to be a stuck-up baiter who could do nothing more than spit out some old and tired one-liners. Hell, I wish that Stanford WOULD open up the pages and let everyone read them - it wouldn't take much for most decent people to agree that you were the problem poster on the page.

All you were and still are is an antagonist, pure and simple. You must have a personal grudge against everyone you meet, it appears to me. I suggest you take a look in the mirror, a good, LONG look, and see what a genuine idiot looks like with your own two eyes.

It says in your profile that you are a retired judge. Damn, I pity the poor bastard who dared to argue his case with you if he said anything you, in your infinite wisdom, didn't like.

And just so you know, Chappy, I don't care what your politics are. This has nothing to do with politics. It has everything to do with common MANNERS.....

....of what appears to be very little, on your part.

I am not one to flame someone else largely, but in your case, I'll just say that I'm glad you got thrown off the page.

So go back to YOUR sandbox, and quit YOUR whining. I'm sure that you will have some smartass reply to this post, but I won't be reading it. This will be my last remark to you on the bj21 site.

Good riddance.

Thanks for the info. I don't much about Hi-Opt II other than what's in CVBJ. It has an insurance table that is full of six's, just like the insurance table for AOII in that program, so I thought they might follow the same rules.

Off the top of your head, do you know if one system will insure more often than the other, or will HOII just be more accurate when it does insure?

Thanks again.

Now put aside your kneepads for the PC Mob for a moment and ask yourself how many of their group have been banned?

Stanford Wong has the proof, all he has to do is let people read those pages. I believe he is trying not to embarass you. I didn't even bother to read your drivel. Join the others in the sandbox.

The PC mob is still upset, still on the attack, and still making fools of themselves!

"I believe the PC weenies first became enraged when I mentioned the obvious fact that the only people upset with America's progress against terrorism were the terrorists and most liberals."

If that's why you were ostracized from green-chip then I agree with you, that you, were banned without cause.

Gary

You PC weenies continue to prove my case with your continuing attacks. I'll just respond again with "Thank you!" You'll need to get over it, America flushed the Johns!(Kerry/Edwards).

"The TRUTH regarding your green chip allegations is quite evident. All Stanford Wong has to do is open the pages for everyone to read for themselves. He won't as I believe it would embarass all the whiners."

Wong isn't going to open any paid site to the general public so why continue with that line of assault?

"It appears to me that he made a business decision choosing to protect the weeny crowd as they outnumber me."

What's wrong with that? I do believe this site exists to make money, not as a non profit organization. Wong should make decisions based on what those decisions mean to his business.

If you were banned because you are a conservative, that was without cause. But even if that's the reason for your banning, if the best business decision was to eliminate you, then your expulsion was justified. Remember, your inclusion at the start was only allowed by Wong as a privilege, not as a right. Your exclusion would be a business decision without any right to appeal.

So... forget it and move on.

Gary

"I see you're still on your PC kneepads"
You obviously don't know who you are referreing to. I personally bow to no one and neither do I shill for anyone.

"You PC weenies continue to prove my case with your continuing attacks."
I didn't attack you. Believe this; If I ever attack you, it will be a direct hit without any cushion to soften the blow.

Gary

"I see you're still on your PC kneepads"

"You PC weenies continue to prove my case with your continuing attacks."

You just experienced the very same thing that Chappy did on the Green Chip page.

Are you willing to retract what you said in your first post to him now?

When they circumcised Chappy, they threw away the wrong piece, IMHO.

Regards,
drumz1

Thank you for proving my case!

Thanks for proving my case!

"You just experienced the very same thing that Chappy did on the Green Chip page.

Are you willing to retract what you said in your first post to him now?"

All I basically said was; 'If he was banned from green-chip simply because he leaned to the right politically, then he was banned without cause' How Chappy could read an attack into that is nothing short of amazing and comically amusing.

So, although I wouldn't retract the general comments I made, I would add it is now clear to me that there was more to Chappy's banning than just being a political conservative.

And as I said in a post below, Wong has the right to refuse inclusion to anyone he wants and if it's a business decision then it's the right decision.

All the best,
Gary

posters after your hide.

In another time these same people probably would have cried out for the crucifixion of Christ.

I think they should look deep within their soul to see just what it is that makes them hate you so much for simply defending yourself and your country.

This hate they manifest is pure evil.

Beware of their baiting.

It is their wish to silence your noble cause for freedom and your knowledge about BJ. Take care not to fall into their trap.

Has the GC fee been returned yet?

I