Books mention with worse rules you need a bigger bet spread to beat the game which makes sense. Blackjack for blood confirms this in a later section. This must be true right? The 2 betting charts on page 89 for the advanced omega 2 say the oppisite. These charts go by the running count for betting instead of using the true count.
Example:
Las vegas rules with double on any two:
6 decks remaining bet 2 units at +20 and more than 2 units at +27
5 decks remaining bet 2 units at +15 and more than 2 units at +21
The chart goes down in a pattern like this to 1/2 deck remaining
Reno rules Double on 10 or 11 only:
6 decks remaining bet 2 units at +27 and more than 2 units at +34
5 decks remaining bet 2 units at +21 and more than 2 units at +27
The chart goes down in a pattern like this to 1/2 deck remaining
So what the chart is saying is bet less with worse rules. How can this be right?

