is it correct to double 11 vs 10 at count +4 and higher(european no hole card) even tough dealer could have BJ
insure, but I do not know about the double down with ENHC.
I asked a similar question yesterday to the GameMaster email at bj21.com regarding 11 vs A, and the response was yes, and insurance should be taken as well.
However, if you 'insure', it means you think the dealer likely has BJ, so why do you want to double down on the 11 the amount of money you lose?
Doubling against the ace is absolutely suicidal under ENHC-rule, believe me!
Francis Salmon
How about under standard Las Vegas 6-deck low-limit BJ shoe rules?
