BJ21.com Free Message Board

Postbusters could you leave this up?

Posted By: Maverick
Date: 9 Jun 01, 11:26 am

In Response To: The Pro's Hand Count Without A Running Count System (Crackerjack)

Some of the more experienced posters believe this method to be a method of counting. A rough 10 ratios. DD for one has suggested this is really a way of counting cards, just not one at a time.

Another repsected BJ counter has emailed me that this is a counting system.

The Pro has indicated his belief that this particular method will compare well with KO. Therefore, I suggested Crackerjack consider positng it here where the more established counters could evaluate it.

Regards,
Maverick

Messages In This Thread

• The Pro's Hand Count Without A Running Count System -- Crackerjack -- 9 Jun 01, 9:19 am
  • Postbusters could you leave this up? -- Maverick -- 9 Jun 01, 11:26 am
    • I agree -- MathProf -- 9 Jun 01, 1:11 pm
      • Math Prof.....It is a count based upon the following: -- Crackerjack -- 9 Jun 01, 2:19 pm
        • And each round stands alone -- Maverick -- 9 Jun 01, 3:40 pm
          • this will weaken it even further -- StrayFrog -- 9 Jun 01, 3:59 pm
        • Since your data is limited -- Midwest Mogul -- 12 Jun 01, 7:12 am
  • Crackerjack - You have to tell them -- Maverick -- 9 Jun 01, 11:28 am
    • For a link... -- Crackerjack -- 9 Jun 01, 12:14 pm
      • Why would the post be busted? -- In Hiding -- 9 Jun 01, 3:49 pm
        • Then this page should be called the card-counters page not misc BJ -- Crackerjack -- 9 Jun 01, 11:59 pm
          • No! -- MathProf -- 10 Jun 01, 7:22 am
      • Re Link -- Portland -- 10 Jun 01, 12:10 am
        • That is incorrect -- Crackerjack -- 10 Jun 01, 12:35 am
    • I'm with Maverick on this -- In Hiding -- 9 Jun 01, 12:33 pm
  • Some additional interesting data... -- Crackerjack -- 9 Jun 01, 1:59 pm
    • Your "total won (lost)" line is confusing. -- In Hiding -- 9 Jun 01, 3:31 pm
      • Thanks, I will keep that in mind with any updates (nt) -- Crackerjack -- 9 Jun 01, 3:36 pm
    • Who many decks were simulated here -- Doubtful counter -- 9 Jun 01, 11:55 pm
    • You are wasting your time -- Parker -- 10 Jun 01, 11:30 am
      • Well if nothing else, it has been good practice -- crackerjack -- 10 Jun 01, 2:02 pm
        • Very confusing. -- Titaniumman -- 10 Jun 01, 2:49 pm
  • Decks (?) -- Doubtful counter -- 10 Jun 01, 12:17 am
    • Yes -- Crackerjack -- 10 Jun 01, 12:44 am
      • Cracker - thanks, 6 deck. -- Doubtful counter -- 10 Jun 01, 2:35 am
        • It would not work with a CSM -- Crackerjack -- 10 Jun 01, 5:54 am
          • Why not? -- BobbyC -- 10 Jun 01, 1:24 pm
            • Then again, it might....hmmmm -- crackerjack -- 10 Jun 01, 1:43 pm
        • A suggestion! -- Crackerjack -- 10 Jun 01, 6:05 am

BJ21.com Free Message Board is maintained by Pi Yee Press