BJ21.com Free Message Board

Wonging

Posted By: Student
Date: 14 Jan 02, 3:30 pm

In Response To: Thank you alienated, great explanation (nt) (Student)

I suspect Wonging this game would be the way to go.
Any way to simulate it?,I think not.
EV would be close to that of single deck game wouldn't it?

Messages In This Thread

• Multi-deck SMs -- Student -- 13 Jan 02, 9:16 pm
  • absolutely not -- DD' -- 13 Jan 02, 9:58 pm
    • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 14 Jan 02, 7:08 am
      • is this the way you believe the CSMs shuffle? -- DD' -- 14 Jan 02, 8:30 am
        • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 14 Jan 02, 8:44 am
          • sorry, but I didn't mean CSMs either -- DD' -- 14 Jan 02, 8:52 am
            • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 14 Jan 02, 9:20 am
              • if it really works -- DD' -- 14 Jan 02, 9:33 am
                • Pardonnez-moi, I thought this was -- Student -- 14 Jan 02, 3:18 pm
                • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 14 Jan 02, 5:20 pm
                  • alieated - How to plug it into -- Student -- 14 Jan 02, 6:34 pm
                    • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 14 Jan 02, 9:15 pm
                      • Answer - Not a lot ;-) (nt) -- Student -- 14 Jan 02, 9:32 pm
          • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 14 Jan 02, 9:15 am
            • This would be a small distributive latency. (nt) -- Clarke Cant -- 14 Jan 02, 11:27 am
              • Could you elaborate please Clarke? (nt) -- Student -- 14 Jan 02, 3:21 pm
                • Sure, see the 9th chapter of Blackjack Therapy -- Clarke Cant -- 15 Jan 02, 3:04 pm
              • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 14 Jan 02, 8:49 pm
                • Comment on "even zero" information... -- Clarke Cant -- 15 Jan 02, 2:30 pm
            • Thank you alienated, great explanation (nt) -- Student -- 14 Jan 02, 3:20 pm
              • Wonging -- Student -- 14 Jan 02, 3:30 pm
            • Let me get this straight -- William S. Preston, Esquire -- 14 Jan 02, 3:39 pm
              • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 14 Jan 02, 5:11 pm
                • I can't see how this can be true -- William S. Preston, Esquire -- 15 Jan 02, 3:04 am
                  • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 15 Jan 02, 8:38 am
                    • Lets take this back to basics -- Green Baize Vampire -- 15 Jan 02, 3:22 pm
                      • Too basic -- Clarke Cant -- 15 Jan 02, 4:07 pm
                      • Easy -- Clarke Cant -- 15 Jan 02, 5:32 pm
                      • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 15 Jan 02, 11:08 pm
                        • Many cases; no additional information -- ET Fan -- 16 Jan 02, 5:55 am
                          • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 16 Jan 02, 2:11 pm
                            • I got it about how removals can be considered from specific regions... -- Clarke Cant -- 16 Jan 02, 2:52 pm
                              • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 16 Jan 02, 3:25 pm
                                • Can't confuse.... -- Clarke Cant -- 16 Jan 02, 3:29 pm
                                • X-1 -- Clarke Cant -- 16 Jan 02, 4:02 pm
                              • Red Ted -- Minnesota Fats -- 16 Jan 02, 6:52 pm
                            • Disagree -- ET Fan -- 16 Jan 02, 11:43 pm
                              • The segment is unknown.... -- Clarke Cant -- 17 Jan 02, 8:09 am
                            • You can't predict segments -- Theef -- 17 Jan 02, 5:52 am
                              • I agree -- DD' -- 17 Jan 02, 9:30 am
                                • Some simplification...and a criticism of attack discussions. -- Clarke Cant -- 17 Jan 02, 11:04 am
                                  • I don't follow to your conclusion -- DD' -- 17 Jan 02, 1:32 pm
                                    • Then you're safe! -- Don Schlesinger -- 17 Jan 02, 1:46 pm
                                      • attitude -- Bill Goldstein -- 18 Jan 02, 3:31 am
                                    • See my above post new thread... -- Clarke Cant -- 18 Jan 02, 9:16 am
                                      • you have to see the cards -- DD' -- 18 Jan 02, 10:01 am
                                        • DD here is what I have about cut-control lite -- Clarke Cant -- 18 Jan 02, 10:29 am
                                        • & I question the validity of the claim anyway -- DD' -- 18 Jan 02, 12:33 pm
                                          • I must mildly disagree but it is an important disagreement... -- Clarke Cant -- 18 Jan 02, 1:07 pm
                                          • A listing of ways this information can be used: -- Clarke Cant -- 19 Jan 02, 10:41 am
                      • God, I hate it ... -- ET Fan -- 16 Jan 02, 1:28 am
                    • How something Don missed about trip ruin opens such possibilities.. -- Clarke Cant -- 15 Jan 02, 3:41 pm
                      • I was wondering . . . -- Don Schlesinger -- 15 Jan 02, 4:09 pm
                        • It is not BS Don. You cannot accept.... -- Clarke Cant -- 15 Jan 02, 4:24 pm
                        • When Don self busts his post above.... -- Clarke Cant -- 15 Jan 02, 4:32 pm
                          • No more self busting to orphan responses (nt) -- Clarke Cant -- 15 Jan 02, 4:46 pm
                      • Somehow I just knew -- Cyrus -- 15 Jan 02, 7:16 pm
                        • He dreams it, eats it, sleeps it! (nt) -- Don Schlesinger -- 15 Jan 02, 8:37 pm
                          • Bull****,it is that Don just forgets the most important parts always! (nt) -- Clarke Cant -- 16 Jan 02, 10:16 am
                    • Shuffle 2 -- William S. Preston, Esquire -- 15 Jan 02, 5:09 pm
                      • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 15 Jan 02, 9:52 pm
                        • Alienated, please e-mail me (nt) -- Roger Harris -- 16 Jan 02, 5:07 pm
                  • See my other post on Trip ruin here. -- Clarke Cant -- 15 Jan 02, 4:04 pm

BJ21.com Free Message Board is maintained by Pi Yee Press