BJ21.com Free Message Board

How about restating slightly differently several times

Posted By: SOTSOG
Date: 23 Dec 01, 1:45 pm

In Response To: Counting versus bangers...for ETF, Cacarullo, Wattenberger, SBA fans etc. (Clarke Cant)

"Strangely a simple formula seems to provide indexes for different probabilities of the hole card being a ten: propability of the prediction of the dealer having a ten (similar for being pat) multiplied by half the index for that total versus a 7 upcard. You add to the index, when you have a banger prediction, of a ten, half of the index of that total versus 7 ( for 7s boost the index by 50%) multiplied by the accuracy you have noted for your predictions (to restate it slightly differently)."

Huh? I'm kind of tired today and don't have the energy to do a translation into English. Sorry. Would you mind providing an example using actual card values and numbers, and I will see if I am mentally alert enough to follow along.

I'm positive there is useful information hidden there somewhere.

Messages In This Thread

• Counting versus bangers...for ETF, Cacarullo, Wattenberger, SBA fans etc. -- Clarke Cant -- 23 Dec 01, 12:58 pm
  • How about restating slightly differently several times -- SOTSOG -- 23 Dec 01, 1:45 pm
    • Example: -- Clarke Cant -- 23 Dec 01, 1:51 pm
      • How about 15 vs 9? -- SOTSOG -- 23 Dec 01, 2:31 pm
        • Yes... -- Clarke Cant -- 23 Dec 01, 2:43 pm
          • Got it. (nt) -- SOTSOG -- 23 Dec 01, 2:58 pm
            • SOTSOG=bad at cracks, good at analysis!;-) (nt) -- Clarke Cant -- 23 Dec 01, 3:04 pm
              • I've seen a few bad cracks -- SOTSOG -- 23 Dec 01, 4:19 pm
                • (Message Deleted by Poster) -- alienated -- 25 Dec 01, 5:10 am
                  • That is the point I tried to make...ETF just did a clone dis, cut and dash! -- Clarke Cant -- 26 Dec 01, 2:15 pm
      • What happened to the 50%? (nt) -- lurker -- 23 Dec 01, 3:49 pm
  • Shucks! All excited, then tried it for P = 16/52 Merry Christmas, Clarke ;) (nt) -- ET Fan -- 23 Dec 01, 10:43 pm
    • P=16/32 of course is a miss, initial finding of a non-linear effect -- Clarke Cant -- 24 Dec 01, 9:23 am
    • I expected better ETF -- Clarke Cant -- 24 Dec 01, 10:43 am
    • Not wanting to start a new thread here, but ETF this is the same mistake... -- Clarke Cant -- 27 Dec 01, 3:59 pm
      • Very politely, then: -- ET Fan -- 28 Dec 01, 6:57 am
        • Thankyou....still a little rude -- Clarke Cant -- 28 Dec 01, 9:38 am
        • Possible Theory -- Clarke Cant -- 28 Dec 01, 3:06 pm
          • Anybody else even care about combining counting and hole card play?? -- Clarke Cant -- 29 Dec 01, 12:33 pm
            • Ahah ! Who is Clark Can't -- Hawk -- 4 Jan 02, 8:59 am
              • I created a whole ID for my stage name.... (nt) -- Clarke Cant -- 4 Jan 02, 10:33 am
              • Nothing sensitive is there... -- Clarke Cant -- 4 Jan 02, 10:52 am
            • Zman's Reply -- Zman -- 5 Jan 02, 10:15 pm
              • We go back further too... -- Clarke Cant -- 6 Jan 02, 12:11 pm
                • A photo from the Z-files -- Zman's Human Resources Dept -- 7 Jan 02, 12:06 am
                  • Rusty, I love it - - - Hehehe -- LOL -- 7 Jan 02, 3:22 am
              • Saves being bored to death.... -- Clarke Cant -- 7 Jan 02, 11:39 am
                • One camos the other, the picture.... -- Clarke Cant -- 8 Jan 02, 1:15 pm

BJ21.com Free Message Board is maintained by Pi Yee Press