BJ21.com Free Message Board

Do your GC friends understand this?

Posted By: TG
Date: 21 Dec 01, 2:06 pm

In Response To: bet big so you can get on with life (DD')

"If you triple or quadruple it, so that you have a reasonable chance of success, then switch to a very conservative ROR. Otherwise you can go broke quickly and won't waste as much of your life."

This is basicly what I was trying to explain to a few of your hard headed green chip friends of why I decided to lower my ROR to less than half after winning at an alarming rate.

I know the book says "Pump it up if your bank increases!!"
Yeah, tell me about it book...maybe I have other more important things on my mind.

What I did was basicly take advantage of my winnings in order to decrease risk of ruin. I imagine this makes sense to those who plan on sticking around casinos for a long time to come, such as myself.

My simple advice to those who would like to make a living playing BJ is dont try this and expect to raise a functional family at the same time. I cant imagine someone going through half of what I've been thru while trying to pacify their family with security and happiness.

Messages In This Thread

• BJ FOR A LIVING -- WILBUR -- 20 Dec 01, 11:21 am
  • BJ FOR a LIVING -- Cubanpete -- 20 Dec 01, 11:50 am
    • Do you work -- El Burro -- 20 Dec 01, 12:21 pm
      • bj -- Cubanpete -- 20 Dec 01, 12:42 pm
        • do you work at bellatlantic ? (nt) -- El Burro -- 20 Dec 01, 2:36 pm
        • Betting Stragety -- Mack Gilley -- 21 Dec 01, 12:47 pm
          • bet big so you can get on with life -- DD' -- 21 Dec 01, 1:17 pm
            • Do your GC friends understand this? -- TG -- 21 Dec 01, 2:06 pm
              • I was not being entirely serious and scientific here -- DD' -- 21 Dec 01, 2:35 pm
                • Solid advice DD (nt) -- Bang-Bang -- 21 Dec 01, 5:57 pm
                • Explanation Please DD -- Double21 -- 21 Dec 01, 6:00 pm
                  • you are not misreading me -- DD' -- 21 Dec 01, 6:54 pm
                    • Everybody in this part of the thread ignores couponomy it seems (nt) -- Clarke Cant -- 22 Dec 01, 2:29 pm
                      • I don't -- DD' -- 22 Dec 01, 8:56 pm
                        • DAMN Straight. (nt) -- Frank Stanton -- 22 Dec 01, 9:20 pm
                • Real-World Businesses -- MathProf -- 22 Dec 01, 4:26 pm
                  • Easy there Math Prof -- Frank Stanton -- 22 Dec 01, 4:55 pm
                    • Is it by any chance possible -- Cyrus -- 22 Dec 01, 5:29 pm
                  • Incomplete or inaccurate analysis -- NA -- 22 Dec 01, 5:36 pm
                  • that was hardly an IBM or GM -- DD' -- 22 Dec 01, 9:00 pm
  • advisable only for those with few good alternatives -- DD' -- 20 Dec 01, 12:23 pm
    • DD' please !! -- El Burro -- 20 Dec 01, 12:46 pm
      • Reason For asking -- WILBUR -- 20 Dec 01, 1:43 pm
        • here is the danger -- DD' -- 20 Dec 01, 5:44 pm
          • Car/Bankroll excelant "rule of thumb" good post! (nt) -- Clarke Cant -- 21 Dec 01, 9:27 am
      • Best answer I've seen yet -- Parker -- 20 Dec 01, 7:01 pm
        • Right book, wrong author! :-) -- Don Schlesinger -- 20 Dec 01, 7:42 pm
          • Right author, wrong book! :-) -- Parker -- 20 Dec 01, 8:55 pm
        • My car cost me $2K ('93 Geo Metro, used). My BR: $2K. Wahooo!!!! (nt) -- Thom Sawyer! -- 21 Dec 01, 2:46 pm
    • Why so pessimistic -- Francis Salmon -- 20 Dec 01, 3:51 pm
      • you may have been ready -- DD' -- 20 Dec 01, 5:08 pm
        • Sometimes the decision can be thrust upon you. -- Igor -- 21 Dec 01, 1:04 am
          • How about solving the sight problem? -- Ferdinand -- 21 Dec 01, 5:10 am
            • Eyeglasses? Laser surgery? -- Igor -- 21 Dec 01, 8:33 am
              • VA=world's original abusive HMO...perhaps... -- Clarke Cant -- 21 Dec 01, 9:30 am
                • Thanks, but my problems are retinal, not refractive. -- Igor -- 21 Dec 01, 9:46 am
                  • New procedures handle that... -- Clarke Cant -- 21 Dec 01, 9:53 am
                    • I am indebted to you. Thanks. (nt) -- Igor -- 21 Dec 01, 10:23 am
                      • Floaters.... -- Clarke Cant -- 21 Dec 01, 10:34 am
                        • CC, is there ANYTHING you don't know? :-) (nt) -- Neko -- 21 Dec 01, 11:06 am
                          • Well at least I know what I don't know.... -- Clarke Cant -- 21 Dec 01, 2:06 pm
                            • I Think You Toy With Us Earthlings (n/t) (nt) -- human -- 21 Dec 01, 11:58 pm
                      • Some advice.... -- Clarke Cant -- 21 Dec 01, 2:42 pm
                        • Gracias para todo, and please use my email address for blackjack issues. (nt) -- Igor -- 21 Dec 01, 4:20 pm
              • Sorry to hear -- Ferdinand -- 21 Dec 01, 10:26 am
                • Cannot sue VA -- Clarke Cant -- 21 Dec 01, 2:50 pm
                  • In my surgery I was a subject... -- Igor -- 21 Dec 01, 4:30 pm
                    • VA/military medicine -- steross -- 21 Dec 01, 5:49 pm
                      • Say what??? -- Railbird -- 21 Dec 01, 9:36 pm
                      • IGOR-you are WRONG -- Frank Stanton -- 21 Dec 01, 9:56 pm
                        • Wrong about what? -- Igor -- 22 Dec 01, 12:20 am
                          • correct Igor should have been Steross -- Frank Stanton -- 22 Dec 01, 2:17 am
                          • VA -- Railbird -- 22 Dec 01, 8:25 am
                            • Good advice. Thanks. -- Igor -- 22 Dec 01, 11:13 am
              • What a horror story! -- Neko -- 21 Dec 01, 11:04 am
                • If Clinton had gotten his way -- CO Red -- 23 Dec 01, 11:35 am
                  • Maybe, then, maybe not. -- Igor -- 23 Dec 01, 1:22 pm
                    • Exactly right -- Maverick -- 23 Dec 01, 4:35 pm
          • depends -- DD' -- 21 Dec 01, 12:58 pm
            • ...not where you want to be... -- Igor -- 21 Dec 01, 1:43 pm
              • exaclty, agreeing and LOL (nt) -- Clarke Cant -- 21 Dec 01, 3:05 pm
    • The voice of reason -- rwp -- 20 Dec 01, 4:48 pm
      • yes, thank God. And not a moment too soon. (nt) -- DD' -- 20 Dec 01, 5:10 pm
        • Are you responding to rwp's post or subject? :-) (nt) -- Contrail -- 20 Dec 01, 5:51 pm
          • I answered his question (nt) -- DD' -- 20 Dec 01, 8:48 pm
  • Things to consider -- Bootlegger -- 20 Dec 01, 1:17 pm
    • Yet another thing to consider -- Parker -- 20 Dec 01, 7:10 pm
    • Something else even more important -- Scarce -- 20 Dec 01, 7:30 pm
    • yes, it can be done -- bigplayer -- 20 Dec 01, 11:29 pm
  • My Two Cents -- Golf Cart -- 20 Dec 01, 2:05 pm
  • BJ for a living -- T.C.T. -- 20 Dec 01, 8:08 pm
  • BJ: the dead-end bj profession -- Commonsense -- 20 Dec 01, 10:06 pm
  • BOTTOM LINE -- pat -- 21 Dec 01, 12:24 am
    • re: Barring -- T.C.T. -- 21 Dec 01, 4:25 am
      • the problem with -- pat -- 21 Dec 01, 4:35 am
      • Opportunity is where you find it. -- Igor -- 21 Dec 01, 8:54 am
      • not really a conflict -- DD' -- 21 Dec 01, 7:07 pm

BJ21.com Free Message Board is maintained by Pi Yee Press